July pfp
July
@july
If you want a smaller government that functions and has the least amount of bureaucracy, a theory I have is that the best option is to become a citizen of a somewhat temperate country that has industrialized (ofc you have to be naturalized first; but that’s a separate topic) The theory is - the more people you have to manage, the bigger the bureaucracy. Right, so focus on smaller countries, low population size or population density that have high GDP per capita — I’m thinking countries like Luxembourg, Lichtenstein, Singapore, Iceland, Andorra, San Marino, Malta, Ireland, Qatar, Bahrain, etc to a certain extent Norway, Denmark, Slovenia etc
21 replies
7 recasts
36 reactions
July pfp
July
@july
Completely speculative theory no data to back it up
1 reply
1 recast
11 reactions
Adam pfp
Adam
@adam-
The other component to acknowledge in this equation is the artery clogging effect sonority has governments. Yes, its bad at scale, but just because it's a small government doesn't absolve it of the likelihood of corruption. The longer people stay in power, the less likely are they to pass on the baton.
0 reply
0 recast
2 reactions
antaur ↑ pfp
antaur ↑
@antaur.eth
I'd add temperate climate in the context of global warming = new climate oasis, which some here ain't gonna be. Slovenia has some intrigue for me...
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
Andy Jagoe pfp
Andy Jagoe
@andyjagoe
https://warpcast.com/andyjagoe/0x058b8efa
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
Mo pfp
Mo
@meb
Still waiting on the government version of the next “billion dollar 10 person startup”, ie. a government that can run a decently sized country (such as France) with minimal bureaucracy. It requires a change of mental software though, both from the governors and those who govern. Also requires systemic implementation of AI without falling into black box bot governance dystopia, public acceptance of massive public sector layoffs, and a refocusing of the economy to actual added value output, and efficient taxation + essential base wealth redistribution without killing high earner incentives. One good practical example is Estonia. What they’ve done with e-residence and full administrative digitalisation is beautiful example of what can happen when governments focus on efficiency. Agree that this is more realistic with smaller countries though, governing 2 million people is hella different than 60m or even more. Also helps when society has a culture of pragmatism and problem solving vs ideology
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
Evan Mann pfp
Evan Mann
@evanmann
I don’t necessarily disagree, but I also think it’s a good strategy to see the audience as global and to start as (or become) the citizen of an “influential” country and maximize your potential to build a platform of influence in order to reach the globe—I am an English-speaking, native citizen of the United States; Bezos is here, Musk is here, but so is Malala, and so on. Speaking from this mountain, launching from this springboard, so to speak, creates an incredible reach and velocity with which one can influence everything else. I suspect that as values, attitudes, and infrastructure continue to evolve that this will change, but for now my advice would be for anyone who wants to change the world to reach for that lever.
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
Kristin Piljay pfp
Kristin Piljay
@kristinpiljay
Although, to add something more to my other comment, would these tiny countries be vulnerable to being taken over by a neighboring large country if there is regional conflict? I don't think they could defend themselves from that adequately.
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
Kristin Piljay pfp
Kristin Piljay
@kristinpiljay
Lichtenstein - I'm glad that's on someone else's radar. Such a tiny, tiny little country. "Temperate" politically? Iceland has always been fascinating to me and I have wanted to find a way to live there longer term, at least as an experiment. Although it's a very expensive country and limited options in fresh produce, even with their greenhouses.
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
accountless pfp
accountless
@accountless.eth
vanuatu
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
iSpeakNerd 🧙‍♂️ pfp
iSpeakNerd 🧙‍♂️
@ispeaknerd.eth
not quite logarithmic yeah https://warpcast.com/tabletop/0x5f99a2a7
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
law pfp
law
@traguy.eth
I love exploring unconventional ideas that challenge our assumptions lol Your list of countries had me too, especially the microstates like Luxembourg, Lichtenstein, and San Marino. These countries have to be highly efficient to manage their limited resources effectively. But what about the aspects of life that aren't necessarily tied to economic success? Do you think these countries would also provide a better quality of life, in terms of healthcare, education, and overall well-being?
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
Metaphorical pfp
Metaphorical
@hyp
Honestly I'm not sure 95% of people do any critical thinking on issues. They just parrot their "team" no matter what, same as football. "Small government" is one such rallying cry, y'know, until the government is working on your team's pet projects.
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
bashobits 🚅✨🔵💨🫐 pfp
bashobits 🚅✨🔵💨🫐
@bashobits
After spending time in cities with strong infra (physical, social, legal), it’s even more sad and painful spending time in the dysfunctional ones
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Israa🅰️ 🎩 pfp
Israa🅰️ 🎩
@faraaf
i think bureaucracy is everywhere especially when you look at the world as a whole community being regulated and punished with a specific law
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
El Bocha 🎩 pfp
El Bocha 🎩
@bochini
While these countries have relatively small and efficient governments, they also face unique challenges. Some, like Singapore, are highly urbanized city-states where population density is high, which can create different problems than larger countries. Others, like Iceland and Norway, have to manage large territories with small populations, which can present logistical challenges. However, your theory makes sense, not taking into account the issue of becoming a citizen, which depending on the country can be a cumbersome and complicated process.
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
UOys pfp
UOys
@uoys
70-80% of that list, probably some of the toughest countries to gain naturalisation. They know it too and are pricing it in.
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Archilles ༄ pfp
Archilles ༄
@archilles
Don’t you think most of these smaller countries still practice high level bureaucracy ? For example I think Malta ranks in the top countries that practices the most bureaucracy in the world
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Hogan Prison no 619 pfp
Hogan Prison no 619
@hoganthereformed
which country would you pick and why?
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Kelvin🎩 pfp
Kelvin🎩
@kel66.eth
Happy new week fren This can result in more efficient public services and a more responsive government. Choosing to live in such countries can certainly be appealing for those who value efficient and effective governance.
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction