Content pfp
Content
@
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
July pfp
July
@july
One person’s spam can easily be another person’s favorite content on the internet The more people join any network, the more this becomes the case. Early on it’s easy to say what is spam and what is not spam, but as the network grows, it’s a lot more murky. Spam is not objective as one would like it to be
23 replies
14 recasts
151 reactions
robin pfp
robin
@robin
spammy post
1 reply
0 recast
3 reactions
KNNY pfp
KNNY
@knny
I just don’t understand why can’t people just upload their own algorithm. I mean people complained about it so much on X but now that it can realistically happen, nobody brings it up. Like if we’re gonna decentralize the network let’s at least decentralize how the data is delivered too.
1 reply
2 recasts
6 reactions
kevin j 🤗 pfp
kevin j 🤗
@entropybender
wow i wonder who is working on subjective consensus mechanisms @promptrotator.eth
1 reply
0 recast
3 reactions
Samuel is @Farcon you too? DM! pfp
Samuel is @Farcon you too? DM!
@samuellhuber
there are already subgraphs of the network with thousands of users I don't see and will never see. This gets more and more. The townhall vibes were special but also a concentrated like minded horde of people that will likely keep their social graph edges, but there are others too that sometimes come up inbetween
0 reply
0 recast
3 reactions
🎲🎲 pfp
🎲🎲
@dobbelsteen.eth
0 reply
0 recast
3 reactions
Joan Westenberg pfp
Joan Westenberg
@daojoan.eth
This is true. It's like pornography. You know it when you see it etc.
0 reply
0 recast
2 reactions
iSpeakNerd Is In LA For FarCon pfp
iSpeakNerd Is In LA For FarCon
@ispeaknerd.eth
This is a bigger 🧠 version of what we were talking about literally today @dawufi
1 reply
0 recast
2 reactions
greys ↑ pfp
greys ↑
@les
this is a large part of what I think is under-addressed with products and how the new tech stack enables more of these "one persons trash is another persons treasure" experiences. Literally the closes we've come being able to replicate the physical aspect of this. Thank you for your invaluable succinctness.
0 reply
0 recast
2 reactions
frdysk | spirit @ farcon pfp
frdysk | spirit @ farcon
@fufuprophet.eth
True, like how degen sudden explosive growth affected warpcast DAU trajectory
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
Garrett 🎩↑ᖽ pfp
Garrett 🎩↑ᖽ
@garrett
truth
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
Alex Palmer pfp
Alex Palmer
@thatalexpalmer.eth
Always with the real talk here smh 🫡
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
cryptonomori 🎩 pfp
cryptonomori 🎩
@cryptonomori.eth
I agree completely. There is a big difference between defining spam as an act and whether it extends to ideology and the content of what is said. I think that diversity is necessary, even if there is no immediate intersection of different ideas and preferences.
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
cqb pfp
cqb
@cqb
This is why I think there's a good opening for a farcaster client with pluggable sorting algos! Imagine setting up different time lines that curate the same data in different ways depending on your goals. Like channels but for algos
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
Tako Protocol pfp
Tako Protocol
@tako
Absolutely! The definition of spam can vary greatly depending on individual preferences and the evolving dynamics of a network. As communities expand, distinguishing between valuable content and spam becomes increasingly nuanced. It's a reminder of the diverse perspectives shaping our digital experiences.
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
SP pfp
SP
@simonapop
to some, it’s meat in a can
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
Owlito pfp
Owlito
@owlercoaster
Dropping much needed truths in this space as per ush. Today with "platitudes, and hyperbole"...bot or nots words not mine.
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
General Ism 🎩🤫 pfp
General Ism 🎩🤫
@generalism.eth
One man’s spam is another man’s treasure…
0 reply
0 recast
3 reactions
zoo pfp
zoo
@zoo
lets agree tho there is some spamspam, tho fr tbf lesbihonest
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
emush🎩 pfp
emush🎩
@emush
yeah, i like $SPAM more now even dev is dead
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction