Content pfp
Content
@
https://warpcast.com/~/channel/july
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
July pfp
July
@july
One person’s spam can easily be another person’s favorite content on the internet The more people join any network, the more this becomes the case. Early on it’s easy to say what is spam and what is not spam, but as the network grows, it’s a lot more murky. Spam is not objective as one would like it to be
27 replies
7 recasts
75 reactions
Samuel ツ pfp
Samuel ツ
@samuellhuber.eth
there are already subgraphs of the network with thousands of users I don't see and will never see. This gets more and more. The townhall vibes were special but also a concentrated like minded horde of people that will likely keep their social graph edges, but there are others too that sometimes come up inbetween
0 reply
0 recast
2 reactions
kevin j pfp
kevin j
@entropybender
wow i wonder who is working on subjective consensus mechanisms @promptrotator.eth
1 reply
0 recast
2 reactions
Les Greys pfp
Les Greys
@les
this is a large part of what I think is under-addressed with products and how the new tech stack enables more of these "one persons trash is another persons treasure" experiences. Literally the closes we've come being able to replicate the physical aspect of this. Thank you for your invaluable succinctness.
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
robin (◕‿◕ ✿) pfp
robin (◕‿◕ ✿)
@robin
spammy post
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
Eddie Wharton pfp
Eddie Wharton
@eddie
One person’s spam is another’s ham
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
SP pfp
SP
@simonapop
to some, it’s meat in a can
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
cqb pfp
cqb
@cqb
This is why I think there's a good opening for a farcaster client with pluggable sorting algos! Imagine setting up different time lines that curate the same data in different ways depending on your goals. Like channels but for algos
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
iSpeakNerd 🧙‍♂️ pfp
iSpeakNerd 🧙‍♂️
@ispeaknerd.eth
This is a bigger 🧠 version of what we were talking about literally today @dawufi
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
󠀠 pfp
󠀠
@diiice.eth
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Alex Palmer pfp
Alex Palmer
@thatalexpalmer.eth
Always with the real talk here smh 🫡
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
zoo pfp
zoo
@zoo
lets agree tho there is some spamspam, tho fr tbf lesbihonest
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Garrett pfp
Garrett
@garrett
truth
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
frdysk pfp
frdysk
@frdysk
True, like how degen sudden explosive growth affected warpcast DAU trajectory
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
LilPing pfp
LilPing
@pingfeng
300 $DEGEN
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Travis pfp
Travis
@tmat10
500 $degen
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
/ / / / . KNNY® pfp
/ / / / . KNNY®
@knny
I just don’t understand why can’t people just upload their own algorithm. I mean people complained about it so much on X but now that it can realistically happen, nobody brings it up. Like if we’re gonna decentralize the network let’s at least decentralize how the data is delivered too.
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
emush pfp
emush
@emush
yeah, i like $SPAM more now even dev is dead
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
cryptonomori.based.eth pfp
cryptonomori.based.eth
@cryptonomori.eth
I agree completely. There is a big difference between defining spam as an act and whether it extends to ideology and the content of what is said. I think that diversity is necessary, even if there is no immediate intersection of different ideas and preferences.
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
JA Westenberg pfp
JA Westenberg
@joanwestenberg.eth
This is true. It's like pornography. You know it when you see it etc.
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction