The rational perspective, and science in general has a tendency to focus on the problem, and shut everything else out. I think this makes sense, if you were learning how to code and you had to question what a "variable" meant in life instead of just accepting it, it would take too long. 

That being said...

creating and destroying; built flying cars & autonomous vehicles, now building /faust, more here: /july, web: july.rocks

I think that one should take a stand, somewhere, on something. My stand: it's important to remember that rational perspective and science, and technology and progress - it's a means, not an end. The end is the improvement of quality of life, and betterment of humanity as a whole. The means is a way to get to that end

Forgetting this is like starting a restaurant, and being obsessed so much with how to run a restaurant, and how to optimize running a restaurant that you forget to actually serve food, and that you need to make food that is good, and edible. Progress, in some ways requires us to understand our needs, who we are

“It's technology married with liberal arts, married with the humanities, that yields us the result that makes our hearts sing.”
- Steve Jobs

https://www.newyorker.com/news/news-desk/steve-jobs-technology-alone-is-not-enough

Reminded of what @maurice casted recently. We really need the basis of liberal arts and humanities that backs the technology, because what it provides is a map, a map of who we are as a species and entity, and technology can only be applied on top of who we are, not in a vacuum

Reminded of what @maurice casted recently. We really need the basis of liberal arts and humanities that backs the technology, because what it provides is a map, a map of who we are as a species and entity, and technology can only be applied on top of who we are, not in a vacuum

https://warpcast.com/maurice/0x8e0aa198

Because all that progress, even if you come up with it -- it can't just be applied in a vacuum, you have to understand who we are, where we are going, what our needs our, what are dreams our, what we love, what we care about, what we would die for - and only then it becomes easier to build things that apply that tech

Yes. And I think we often try too hard to prescribe neat, logical, axiomatic systems of thinking to our lives. Mostly with good intentions, and for good reasons: to solve problems, to make improvements. But imo the world is more complicated and messy than we feel comfortable admitting.