Content
@
https://warpcast.com/~/channel/robotics
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
July
@july
In the beginning of automobiles era (1885-1920s) low key it’s easy to forget how cars had no dedicated infrastructure. Early on, drivers would take many spare tires with them because you would get many flats. The roads weren't developed, they were all dirt roads, shared with horses and carriages. No gasoline stations, no safety rules, nothing really. Just a weird fun vehicle - now look at today, and where we are. In this context -- I am actually excited about Humanoids as a product category. It's early, and most of what is out there today is shit (and the future that it extrapolates) We can do better
5 replies
3 recasts
35 reactions
Eric Platon
@ic
Learned recently that the first cars were… electric (a few years before the era here). Battery infrastructure was of course completely absent, and the one that was easier to roll out was for thermal versions. How history can put things in perspective!
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
max 🎩🚂
@baseddesigner.eth
This applies to autonomous cars too, infra and roads were built for humans but if we were to rebuilt it for autonomous - our cities would look real different
1 reply
0 recast
6 reactions
bashobits 🚅✨🔵💨🫐
@bashobits
driving cars was wild back then https://media.tenor.com/AIftvCkpjkkAAAAC/falling-apart
0 reply
0 recast
2 reactions
Joshua Fisher ⌐◨-◨
@joshuafisher.eth
Figure is looking great but they need help with marketing. Everything looks like a Terminator intro and it should feel like Eve or WALL·E
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Trejo
@trej
Like cars, what if humanoids consume all the natural resources and void their own existence? If so, at which point in the curve of humanoid evolution is considered congruent with “better” before their own demise. Does the top of the curve last long enough for it to all matter?
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
