Josh Stark
@js
Here's a more digestible thread summarizing my post "Making Sense of Trust Experience" https://stark.mirror.xyz/rkLEVz9p4r3ouusD-WCkWP_iVZYkZ0K7TFkzeRfiXCU
3 replies
7 recasts
22 reactions
Josh Stark
@js
0. Blockchains, legal systems, bridges, buildings, and cloud backups share something in common. They are all systems where we care about their future reliability. Even if they appear to work fine now, their value really depends on whether they work in the future.
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Josh Stark
@js
1. When we use such systems, we decide whether to trust it or not, usually by predicting future behaviour. We use a range of experiences: our own knowledge, past behaviour, expert opinions, social & market signals, and more. Let's call this "Trust Experience" or TX
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Josh Stark
@js
2. One way to look at TX is to compare it to UX. UX = how a person interacts with and experiences a technology TX = how a person interacts with and experiences forming expectations about the future behaviour of that technology
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Josh Stark
@js
3. TX gives a name to an intuition that many people have across blockchain ecosystems: Its not enough that 'chains actually *are* reliable, decentralized, and censorship-resistant. They must also persuade people of these facts, so that users can choose to trust them.
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Josh Stark
@js
4. Improving TX should be a core goal of any blockchain ecosystem, including Ethereum. How should we think about this? Here are three key ideas as a starting point:
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
