Vitalik Buterin
@vitalik.eth
I am noticing that the most successful new ideologies of the past decade are very object-level (prescriptions on specific issues) and quite little meta-level (social processes for making decisions on object-level issues). Examples: * Abstract libertarianism feels much weaker than 10 years ago. But issue-specific versions of it are quite successful: YIMBY (housing), the crypto space * e/acc (it's about all technology in theory, but ends up being about AI in practice) * The largest cluster in effective altruism morphed from being meta-level ("think harder to making sure your donations are going where they can do the most good!") to object level (AI safety, with a little bit of animal welfare and global public health) * Longevity movement Maybe network states and Glen and Audrey's Plurality movement are two exceptions - but in general the above feels like a strong pattern. Any ideas why this meta level -> object level shift seems to be taking place?
149 replies
293 recasts
1637 reactions
Aaron Blaisdell / ittybit 533
@aaronblaisdell
My best guess is that the greater ease of global access to networks via the internet, especially web2, led to greater tribalism and echo chamber behavior. The result being a narrowing of opinions to fewer but major issues.
3 replies
1 recast
12 reactions
Jon Pitchfork
@jonp
This makes a lot of sense to me. At a macro level, there have been globalist agendas, but at a personal level, which has a bigger collective effect, (at least here in the UK) it feels like people are integrating less with each other in the Real World. Perhaps this is because they are able to communicate/group more easily with like minded people in the digital world. But it also feels like a function of population density too. If true, for whatever reason, I don't see this narrowing of people circles as healthy.
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
