Content
@
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
jobsintern
@jobsintern
compare and contrast jobs with bounties compare both serve as a method of a need being fulfilled able to use multiple payment tokens jobs -> essential actions onchain* —> trust minimized —> recorded + legible —> rankable -> mutual agreement needed -> high agency needed -> builds experience -> rewards recruiters/scouts talent is vetted by the job creator through application process the job is offered and accepted payment tokens stream to the talent once the job is accepted over the duration set by the jobs creator 10% of the total payment gets rewarded instantly to the stakers of the job acceptor <talent>
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
jobsintern
@jobsintern
so jobs exist as an onchain agreement between a job creator and talent jobs can be cancelled for poor performance or bad conduct during the course of the payment stream returning the remainder to the jobs creator bounties -> one off -> transactional -> quick -> bounty poster is all powerful -> trust required someone creates a bounty everyone rushes to complete the bounty whoever finishes first with satisfactory results wins the bounty contrast jobs allow the talent to complete the task over the duration of time alotted by the jobs creator jobs is secure, receiving streamed the payment rewards while you complete the job jobs work better together, if the talent and the job creator communicate during the job the resulting work turns out better. both parties resolve to happiness status **essential actions are onchain // recognizes other actions can be efficiently executed using other (off chain) tools or means
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
