![jo76 pfp](https://imagedelivery.net/BXluQx4ige9GuW0Ia56BHw/ae82463b-3905-4485-c15f-ac863757b600/rectcrop3)
jo76
@jo76
20 replies
12 recasts
17 reactions
0 reply
8 recasts
14 reactions
50 replies
9 recasts
56 reactions
12 replies
19 recasts
158 reactions
6 replies
8 recasts
30 reactions
7 replies
6 recasts
13 reactions
![polar pfp](https://i.imgur.com/QbYTbmy.jpg)
It is nice to see a muscular response from people regarding Ethereum's technical identity as (rollup-centric) Roadmap and the implied Endgame. However, it does elide a little how Ethereum's social identity is and always has been somewhat ambiguous, which has not affected its position, which speaks for itself in marketcap and influence. But I do believe there is some truth to the 'identity crisis' there. Nobody can quite agree on a North Star for Ethereum, there is no Social Road Map and people fear even embedding one because they feel it would essentially be cultural centralisation. But I am somewhat concerned about it, about the question mark over what Ethereum is supposed to be, socially. Because on one hand it means we have multiple spinning narratives, none of which has widespread traction, which invites internal conflict and there be dragons (know your blockchain history). On the other, nature abhors a vacuum and if we don't fill it, someone else might, finding ourselves on the edge of our own territory. 0 reply
20 recasts
41 reactions
3 replies
10 recasts
34 reactions
0 reply
5 recasts
31 reactions
5 replies
7 recasts
29 reactions
7 replies
8 recasts
14 reactions
4 replies
4 recasts
17 reactions
56 replies
60 recasts
459 reactions
0 reply
6 recasts
18 reactions
2 replies
9 recasts
19 reactions
25 replies
32 recasts
77 reactions
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
8 replies
16 recasts
35 reactions
0 reply
1 recast
2 reactions
0 reply
2 recasts
1 reaction