Content pfp
Content
@
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

horsefacts pfp
horsefacts
@horsefacts.eth
IMO a fixed $25 to create a channel is probably far *below* the socially optimal price. Many were squatted in an early speculative land grab and are now abandoned. It's much easier to create a new one than commit to curating it and building a community over the long term. Throwing them onchain and letting Coasean bargaining sort it out seems reckless until the concept can outcompete "squat, gamble, and speculate."
5 replies
6 recasts
48 reactions

Matthew pfp
Matthew
@matthew
counter point: what social network charges you to make a community? isn't the namespace centralized anyway?
3 replies
1 recast
17 reactions

Jina pfp
Jina
@jina
I agree Instagram and Twitter only need to tag, I don't know why I should use money to make a channel
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

koisose.lol pfp
koisose.lol
@koisose
dont forget pavel
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction