Content
@
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Erik
@eriks
many such cases throughout history where ppl didn’t care about ________, until they did i gotta believe digital ownership will soon be one of them 🌱
14 replies
3 recasts
45 reactions
Erik
@eriks
could make the case that ppl already care about this today, but they either 1. have a false sense of ownership in current systems 2. don’t know true digital ownership is possible or both i don’t think it requires catastrophe of traditional systems for the realization that ownership on the internet should be default, i believe that it’s just a matter of time until the majority have the light bulb moment
3 replies
2 recasts
9 reactions
John Hoang
@jhoang
What would you consider digital ownership to mean? I believe in digital ownership, but I’m still working on the definition. I consider it to be having the upside to one’s work. Interesting counter point: https://x.com/kylesamani/status/1811374672795308512?s=46
2 replies
0 recast
0 reaction
Erik
@eriks
it's a really good question when i think of ownership i think of control of value - who can profit off of my assets, who can profit off of my identity, who can profit off my data, etc i don't think onchain tech solves this perfectly today and it may never completely solve it, but i do believe it solves it many times over compared to traditional systems gonna check out samani's write up appreciate u sharing!
0 reply
0 recast
2 reactions
Integrated Kyle e/acc
@kylesamani
IP is dead
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
