Content pfp
Content
@
0 reply
20 recasts
20 reactions

fredwilson pfp
fredwilson
@fredwilson.eth
Hi Casters. I promised a follow up to yesterday's post on AI being the native business model for content. Here is that follow up post https://avc.xyz/minting-is-the-native-business-model-for-web3-and-maybe-ai-too
18 replies
24 recasts
140 reactions

Cameron Armstrong pfp
Cameron Armstrong
@cameron
I appreciate this might be in the next post, but are there any examples in the wild of a median user revealed preference to own their “own” interest graph data (or even do micropayments)?
2 replies
0 recast
2 reactions

Jess Sloss !!! pfp
Jess Sloss !!!
@jess
FC ?
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

Cameron Armstrong pfp
Cameron Armstrong
@cameron
I'd like that to be true, but we don't really "own" our data here in a robust way (can pay for temp storage, but actions expire and follows aren't in the protocol) We don't do micropayments at any kind of scale Also there are only 2500 DAUs
4 replies
0 recast
2 reactions

Jess Sloss !!! pfp
Jess Sloss !!!
@jess
something something "we're so early" But ya, I actually think the missing piece is what value results from our contributions to these models. So less about "owning our model" and more about owning the value that model can create.
2 replies
0 recast
2 reactions

Jess Sloss !!! pfp
Jess Sloss !!!
@jess
Also, don't we engage in "micro-payments" every time we interact with a blockchain?
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

Cameron Armstrong pfp
Cameron Armstrong
@cameron
That's why I asked about "in the wild" obv I'm here so I believe this to some degree not sure what you mean by the "value resulting from our contributions", but I think we're diving into increasingly abstract (albeit exciting) forms of "potential value" that has led to the crypto company valuations of last cycle
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction