Content pfp
Content
@
0 reply
20 recasts
20 reactions

ted (not lasso) pfp
ted (not lasso)
@ted
why don’t people form small groups (3-5) around an interest, create a channel, and cast/reply to each other? it could: 1. amplify reach (shared audiences) 2. create richer, more dynamic discussions (shared effort) 3. build deeper connections maybe it feels like extra work or it’s hard to find each other?
31 replies
23 recasts
161 reactions

ted (not lasso) pfp
ted (not lasso)
@ted
instead of person A, B + C casting about topic Y in their own siloes (which happens), it’d be better — for them and for the network — if A, B, C casted in one place and engaged w/ each other. Bluesky, TikTok algo etc. make it easy to discover discussions on specific topics. hard here, so topics don’t grow.
5 replies
9 recasts
69 reactions

Dan Romero pfp
Dan Romero
@dwr.eth
I don't think topic discovery is good anywhere. Hashtags resort to slop pretty quickly.
3 replies
0 recast
8 reactions

jd đŸŒș pfp
jd đŸŒș
@jdl
agree there aren’t strong examples to follow. that said we think it drives the most durable form of network growth hence: https://warpcast.com/jdlewin.eth/0x21869752
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction