Jake Chervinsky pfp

Jake Chervinsky

@jchervinsky

120 Following
5355 Followers


Daniel Barabander pfp
Daniel Barabander
@dbarabander
I’m being boosted so going to take advantage. I think Farcaster is a serious unlock for agents and I’m extremely excited about this category. If you’re building, or thinking of building, an agent on Farcaster, I want to hear from you. Please reach out.
4 replies
12 recasts
160 reactions

Jake Chervinsky pfp
Jake Chervinsky
@jchervinsky
It's a good time for a narrative shift from memecoins back to utility anyway. We're heading into a policy environment that should allow founders to build real products and services that have been "blocked by legal" for years. Memes are fun, but so is rebuilding the internet 🙌
4 replies
49 recasts
114 reactions

Daniel Barabander pfp
Daniel Barabander
@dbarabander
I’m thrilled to share that I’ve been promoted to General Counsel & Investment Partner @variant! As GC I’ll continue the work I’ve been doing alongside @jchervinsky to help our industry define legal & regulatory strategy, & going deep (code-level) w/ founders on their product ideas. I'm also excited to continue working closely w/ founders as a member of the investment team. If you’re working on something new, I’d love to hear from you!
10 replies
14 recasts
115 reactions

Jake Chervinsky pfp
Jake Chervinsky
@jchervinsky
Outside counsel and consultants are shifting their view on doing crypto business in the USA at light speed. Everyone expects a massive reduction in regulatory risk. Nobody knows exactly what's going to happen, but it's enough that the new conventional wisdom is "stay here." 🇺🇸
2 replies
1 recast
15 reactions

Jake Chervinsky pfp
Jake Chervinsky
@jchervinsky
Yes. Historically that doesn’t happen so quickly or completely since agencies don’t want to appear fickle and staff is supposed to be non-political, but it won’t be surprising if Trump agencies are glad to immediately undo anything that came from the Biden administration.
0 reply
1 recast
3 reactions

Jake Chervinsky pfp
Jake Chervinsky
@jchervinsky
President Trump will take office on January 20. Crypto policy will immediately and significantly shift when new leaders take over the federal agencies. Between now and then, the outgoing administration may be busy finalizing rules and filing enforcement actions. Stay frosty 🥶
2 replies
3 recasts
70 reactions

Jake Chervinsky pfp
Jake Chervinsky
@jchervinsky
True. But (and not to stretch the analogy) sometimes the rewards you get from hard mode are worth the extra time and effort.
3 replies
0 recast
2 reactions

Jake Chervinsky pfp
Jake Chervinsky
@jchervinsky
One way to understand the impact of the presidential election on crypto policy: Trump would be like playing on easy mode, Harris like hard mode. But it's the same game — working with Congress, fighting in the courts, etc. — and we'll win either way. Crypto isn't going anywhere.
1 reply
53 recasts
73 reactions

Jake Chervinsky pfp
Jake Chervinsky
@jchervinsky
The SEC spent years saying "tokens are securities." Then last month they took it back, pretended they didn't say it at all, and fake apologized for the confusion it caused. Sorry, but @atuminelli and I aren't buying it, so we told the truth 👇 https://blockworks.co/news/sec-wrong-about-crypto-asset-securities
2 replies
168 recasts
299 reactions

Jake Chervinsky pfp
Jake Chervinsky
@jchervinsky
6/ Special thanks to @ohaiom, a true expert on geofencing, for his review and feedback. We’ve been getting many questions from founders at @variantfund about geofencing. We hope this guide helps them and their counsel decide how it fits into their compliance strategy ✌️ [end]
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

Jake Chervinsky pfp
Jake Chervinsky
@jchervinsky
5/ The guide ends with a summary of best practices for companies and their counsel to consider in establishing an effective U.S. geofence. It also gives suggestions for how to implement each one.
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

Jake Chervinsky pfp
Jake Chervinsky
@jchervinsky
6/ The Morrison court held that: - if a statute has an explicit extraterritoriality provision, then it applies outside U.S. borders, but only up to the provision's limits. - if not, then it only applies to domestic activity under the “presumption against extraterritoriality."
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

Jake Chervinsky pfp
Jake Chervinsky
@jchervinsky
4/ Geofencing is useful when neither of those options work. It’s a pretty extreme solution to the problem of regulatory uncertainty — completely abandoning the US market — but sometimes there’s just no other way. We then do a deep dive into the case law on geofencing.
2 replies
0 recast
0 reaction

Jake Chervinsky pfp
Jake Chervinsky
@jchervinsky
3/ Geofencing is essentially a “when all else fails” fallback option when a company can’t: - satisfy applicable compliance obligations, like registration, disclosures, KYC, etc.; or - design the product in such a way that no compliance obligations apply in the first place.
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

Jake Chervinsky pfp
Jake Chervinsky
@jchervinsky
2/ Our guide explains what you (and your counsel) need to know about geofencing. Geofencing means stopping people in a certain "geography" from accessing a product by creating a virtual “fence” around it. We start by explaining when it's useful as a compliance strategy.
1 reply
0 recast
6 reactions

Jake Chervinsky pfp
Jake Chervinsky
@jchervinsky
1/ As U.S. regulators continue their war on crypto, many founders are thinking about geofencing as a compliance strategy. It can work, but only if it's done right. That’s why @dbarabander and I wrote this Practical Guide to Geofencing: https://blog.variant.fund/newsletter-legal-regulatory-affairs
1 reply
28 recasts
55 reactions

Jake Chervinsky pfp
Jake Chervinsky
@jchervinsky
😂
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

Jake Chervinsky pfp
Jake Chervinsky
@jchervinsky
No one said rebuilding the global financial system would be easy, and hard things tend to hurt. Sentiment in crypto is scary bad right now. But as Churchill said, "success is stumbling from failure to failure with no loss of enthusiasm." Keep grinding. In the end, we win.
4 replies
57 recasts
123 reactions

Jake Chervinsky pfp
Jake Chervinsky
@jchervinsky
"Equally" references the common enterprise prong of the Howey test. Horizontal commonality typically exists when investors are entitled to a pro rata distribution of profits and losses. But this is a complex issue, vertical commonality is different, and you *really* need your own lawyer if you want to do a token.
1 reply
0 recast
2 reactions

Jake Chervinsky pfp
Jake Chervinsky
@jchervinsky
I don't think so. Why would they be? A person could do both at once.
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction