Has the EVM created a Windows-like monopoly?

It's an extremely uphill battle to support non-EVM chains like Solana and Aptos when your dapp and wallet support are baked to work with Ethereum. We’ve had to scope our multi-chain efforts down to EVM for now.

https://github.com/bebverse/universe/issues/3?4

Founder @farquest & @wieldlabs.eth, investing @ miy.com // Previously Meta, Coinbase // cryptojcdenton.twitter // FID #251

cto @ bwl.gg, 100M+ users (bdut.ch) 🙏 $eggs is life

Agreed, I’ve been very impressed with tools like Foundry! We’ve been writing our new open-source contracts with it. 

Some of the official repos we’ve digged around for Aptos in curiosity are poorly documented and not even licensed…

https://github.com/bebverse/contracts

ok i'll be the one to say it

tools to support non-evm blockchains suck ass

adding support for evm?

yarn add ethers

boom, we're in business

adding support for non-evm?

npm-does-it-have-the-lib-mumbo-jumbo-mother-fucker https://i.imgur.com/Szrsij1.png

True. After doing several cross-EVM-chain projects with various GMP providers, it is just too easy to setup cross-chain apps/assets when each chain is EVM. Some of the bridging services are supporting (or building support for) non-EVM chains, but as dapp developer, you still need a non-EVM version of your contract. :(

MetaMask Snaps should help here. By making the wallet extensible the focus will not be narrowed to EVM.

For interoperability of DIDs we are already cooking up a connector service, but market isn’t ready. We need to get usage first.