Jayme Hoffman pfp
Jayme Hoffman
@jayme
I'm also feeling this. Here's why i think you shouldn't fade farcaster rn:
5 replies
4 recasts
28 reactions

Jayme Hoffman pfp
Jayme Hoffman
@jayme
It bleeds with quality Farcaster has the highest density of high-quality people in crypto and decentralized social. Compare the people, projects, and interactions here to any other crypto platform or network … it's not even close. There's some sketchy stuff out there. If you believe decentralized social should exist, then you can assume that Farcaster's edge on quality and thoughtful approaches to building the protocol give it the best shot at winning.
0 reply
0 recast
11 reactions

Jayme Hoffman pfp
Jayme Hoffman
@jayme
There are already big platform wins The success of any platform is determined by the success of the interaction on it. No, there hasn't been a breakout app yet, but we've seen huge glimmers of hope, including Higher, Paragraph, Degen, Neynar, Supercast, Daylight, Frens, and others. Many users have made and raised thousands to millions of dollars just because of Farcaster, and it's still so early.
0 reply
0 recast
6 reactions

Jayme Hoffman pfp
Jayme Hoffman
@jayme
Channel will be businesses Millions of Facebook users created 100M pages and 10M groups (20-30x subreddits). Many had the intention of building them into businesses only to get rugged. What does a world look like where people own their pages/group, can build on them, and can make money however they want, globally? I'm bullish on channels and channel creators.
1 reply
1 recast
19 reactions

Jayme Hoffman pfp
Jayme Hoffman
@jayme
It’s becoming stable Farcaster primitives and Warpcast features are just now, after years of iteration, becoming stable and getting really good. If you had conviction at "messages can't be decrypted" before crypto mini-apps, channels, degen tips, bountycaster, stablecoin pmf, and so many other wins, then why fade now? https://warpcast.com/v/0x9b6f7a25
0 reply
0 recast
5 reactions

adrienne pfp
adrienne
@adrienne
well said πŸ‘ πŸ‘ πŸ‘
0 reply
0 recast
2 reactions