The term "floor" feels outdated for the majority of new NFTs. Every time I see it on a media, commemorative, or app NFT, it almost makes the product feel broken. No way floor goes away, but I do wonder if the successful NFT products and marketplaces from the previous cycle will be held back by this in the next one.

Founder /frameboard + /launchcaster / CSX / YC

Head of Institutional Growth at /solana Foundation. 2x Founder and Investor. /wine host 🍷 nick.vc 

What collections do a good job at uniqueness?

The way around ‘floor’ is to make each NFT truly nonfungible and unique. Most collections are essentially fungies with jpegs.

Working on /niche-internet
Building @kiwi 
Podcasting @ web3talks.xyz
Sharing golds @ goldmine3.xyz

agreed. some of those pics are dope af and i know their owners adore them.

it seems related to the view that "NFTs = shitcoins with pictures" which is ofc very limited

ERC-6551 will reshape the concept of a 'floor' in the NFT world. When every NFT in a collection is unique, carrying diverse attributes, value can't be standardized. Imagine gaming NFTs: A gun with different mods isn't equal to its peers.

I feel like a better metric might be the average sale price using some moving average, like 7 day or 30 day or something. Super easy to game though.

For art (crypto art / NFT) floors by collection do not make any sense. There are hundreds of artists on SuperRare they all get one floor. If anything we need a way to sort by value per artist across many platforms.