Content pfp
Content
@
0 reply
18 recasts
21 reactions

Jacek.degen.eth ๐ŸŽฉ pfp
Jacek.degen.eth ๐ŸŽฉ
@jacek
1/2 GM Degens, Spam Bans Part II ๐Ÿšจ Weโ€™re now using Warpcastโ€™s spam labels instead of building a custom solution. Big thanks to @pichi for posting about it (and sorry for banning you by accident ๐Ÿ™ƒ). If you were mislabeled, follow the tips in her guide to reduce the chance of being flagged as spam. https://warpcast.com/pichi/0x26689924
77 replies
34 recasts
232 reactions

Jacek.degen.eth ๐ŸŽฉ pfp
Jacek.degen.eth ๐ŸŽฉ
@jacek
2/2 Accounts flagged as "Likely" or "Might" engage in spam are banned. Tips = real money, so weโ€™re here to reward legit creators, not spammers. Degen tipping should support quality content, not low-effort farming. Letโ€™s keep it clean and fair. ๐Ÿ’Ž https://x.com/varunsrin/status/1882495875420975262
17 replies
8 recasts
88 reactions

mvr ๐Ÿน pfp
mvr ๐Ÿน
@mvr
wowow there is a lot wrong with the spam labeling by warpcast imho, my advice do is to not ban level 1 if you really want to go for this list I have been a spammer in the past as well, for nothing, and it took 2 months to be reinstated cc @artlu @geoffgolberg
10 replies
3 recasts
35 reactions

Melanin ๐Ÿ’ญ๐Ÿ’œ pfp
Melanin ๐Ÿ’ญ๐Ÿ’œ
@0xmelanin
warpcastโ€™s spam label isnโ€™t flawless and doesnโ€™t favour new users, imo thatโ€™s not the best to use, it would be difficult and discouraging to onboard new users to $DEGEN if they outrightly get put in spam by warpcast and are automatically banned by degen
4 replies
6 recasts
48 reactions

Tatiansa pfp
Tatiansa
@tatiansa
Interesting solution, I'm ok, but what will happen with Degen locks of people that are already marked? I know that some of them can't remove the label several months...๐Ÿ‘€ Also I can suggest to use @talent score for one of criteria as proof of quality.
2 replies
1 recast
28 reactions

hamta.base.eth ๐Ÿ”ต๐ŸŽฉ pfp
hamta.base.eth ๐Ÿ”ต๐ŸŽฉ
@hamta.eth
I have a suggestion to make( Iโ€™m not spam not this frame and not the other list. First, let me clarify that I have never been labeled as spam on any list , and with that in mind, I ask you to listen to my words. When you intend to implement new rules, they should be applied starting from the next month (with the new frame). This allows people to understand that an individual who is active and creating artistic work in the digital space is considered spam and should not be engaged with. This is not something that should be implemented just three days before the end of the month. At this point, the number of points has significantly decreased due to this new scenario and frame. Therefore, either apply the old spam list or introduce the new scenario for the upcoming month.๐Ÿซก
1 reply
2 recasts
17 reactions

Alemac pfp
Alemac
@alemac
That's means that 437,570 users have been banned now... ๐Ÿคฏ
1 reply
1 recast
12 reactions

Inga pfp
Inga
@girl-ua
My account also got blocked, but I am not spamming and was giving out tips to attract new people to the project and for good content in the channel /sense. Very sorry that I was blocked and will no longer be able to participate in the project. Perhaps you can reconsider my blocking @jacek?
4 replies
1 recast
10 reactions

Emily ๐ŸŽฉ๐Ÿƒ๐Ÿ– pfp
Emily ๐ŸŽฉ๐Ÿƒ๐Ÿ–
@mahla
91% of warpcast user flagged as spam๐Ÿฅฒ
0 reply
0 recast
7 reactions

MattwithouttheT ๐ŸŽฉ pfp
MattwithouttheT ๐ŸŽฉ
@mathew.eth
From what I understand, the spam labels are pretty flawed, and Iโ€™ve seen plenty of known users that have been big supporters of DEGEN since last spring end up in category 1. This might not be the best solution, unless the Warpcast creates a way for users to prove theyโ€™re real to get to level 2.
0 reply
0 recast
2 reactions

FeMMie ๐Ÿงช๐Ÿ’จ pfp
FeMMie ๐Ÿงช๐Ÿ’จ
@femmie
hope the accidental ban didnโ€™t cause too much trouble ๐Ÿ‘€
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

Mikolaj  pfp
Mikolaj
@mikos32.eth
Oh nooo not like this, thatโ€™s a very bad idea ๐Ÿ˜Ÿ I was fighting with spam label for a 6months or more (from first day when spam label came to fc I was flagged. Lot of my friends here fight with that too)
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

kevang30.base.eth pfp
kevang30.base.eth
@kevang30.eth
Gm Jacek, It is a good criterion and at least there are aspects to take into account.
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

Marwa ๐Ÿ”ต๐ŸŽฉ pfp
Marwa ๐Ÿ”ต๐ŸŽฉ
@marwaaslam
It shows low risk Does that means , I'm not banned?
2 replies
0 recast
1 reaction

Angela pfp
Angela
@angela1395
https://frames.neynar.com/f/b5b2da9a/69ae0817
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

J Finn ๐ŸŽฉ pfp
J Finn ๐ŸŽฉ
@jdotfinn
this is a disaster, I can already see people like @juliettemeon.eth saying she will be banned ...
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

Dvyne๐ŸŽฉ pfp
Dvyne๐ŸŽฉ
@dummie.eth
Eli5 please
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

Msh๐ŸŽฉ pfp
Msh๐ŸŽฉ
@msh
Hey why i get ban? @jacek can you check it i think it's mistake.
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

Maria Bazooka ๐Ÿ’œ๐ŸŽฉ๐ŸŸช pfp
Maria Bazooka ๐Ÿ’œ๐ŸŽฉ๐ŸŸช
@mariabazooka
๐Ÿ’œ๐ŸŽฉ๐Ÿ™Œ๐Ÿป๐Ÿ’œ
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

TimeTree ๐ŸŒณ pfp
TimeTree ๐ŸŒณ
@timetree
I'm lucky the spam label is 2. But this should not be the standard. When someone becomes interested in degen and starts using farcaster, their labels will most likely be 0 or 1. In fact, there are fewer people who give answers to new users than you might think. $Degen should be a token for everyone, not just a few. Rather than creating impromptu standards, think deeply. It is more important to create your own rules for degen. Also, no one should be banned due to new regulations without prior announcement.
2 replies
6 recasts
30 reactions