Content pfp
Content
@
0 reply
0 recast
2 reactions
itai (building dynamic.xyz) pfp
itai (building dynamic.xyz)
@itai
Need some community design feedback! Which of these 4 options do you like most for our phone login option? Would love to hear what folks think! https://frames-gallery.vercel.app/gallery/phone_design
35 replies
3 recasts
43 reactions
itai (building dynamic.xyz) pfp
itai (building dynamic.xyz)
@itai
(btw this was built as a /frames thanks to a bounty done by @complexlity. cc @linda - bounty to daily use in 96 hours!)
0 reply
0 recast
2 reactions
Connor McCormick ☀️ pfp
Connor McCormick ☀️
@nor
3
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
Jacob pfp
Jacob
@jrf
No. 1
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
erica pfp
erica
@heavygweit
I'd go with #1, all of them are categorized properly First section = old school sign up (phone/email) Second section = SSO Third section = blockchain
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
tyler ↑ pfp
tyler ↑
@trh
Alternate suggestion: give email an icon and put it with the others below.
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Kyran pfp
Kyran
@kyran
3 feels best imo. btw, this would be a perfect opportunity for composable frames - make the last button say “go to poll” and redirect to a poll frame!
1 reply
0 recast
3 reactions
↑langchain 🎩 pfp
↑langchain 🎩
@langchain
4 initially felt the least aesthetic but most functional, but now I realize they'll try to fill out both fields. 3 it is.
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
Drip pfp
Drip
@mac-drip
IMO you only get one 'or' section. you have 'primary' method and secondary. my question is: what is -your- preferred method for users to log in with?
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
William Allen pfp
William Allen
@williamallen.eth
first of all, this is my favorite frame yet (love user feedback!). and I'm a fan of 3 personally, though I think they are all solid.
0 reply
0 recast
4 reactions
jesse.base.eth 🔵 pfp
jesse.base.eth 🔵
@jessepollak
so sick
0 reply
1 recast
1 reaction
⛵️ pfp
⛵️
@ruido
one followed by three
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
Scotty pfp
Scotty
@scot
Option 2: not too many sign in options, efficient with spacing
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
Founding Father pfp
Founding Father
@elpresidente
#1
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
freezer pfp
freezer
@freezer
I like #1. But what I really like is the idea of doing design crits using frames.
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
lemongrass pfp
lemongrass
@lemongrass.eth
3 but move the email button up and group with phone number—I think people more closely associate phone number and email than email (web2) and wallet (web3) unless the goal is really push phone over email
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
Nick Morgan 🎩 pfp
Nick Morgan 🎩
@nickmorgan
3 is my favorite. Makes it clear there’s an email option without overwhelming the screen
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
albi is /nervous pfp
albi is /nervous
@albiverse
Option 3 on my end
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
levy.eth pfp
levy.eth
@levy
this one
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
Sagar Dhawan pfp
Sagar Dhawan
@sagar
I like 3. Doesn't add too much UI clutter while also being more clear about all possible options. (I feel like most would miss the "use email" in Option 2)
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction