Content
@
https://warpcast.com/~/channel/fc-devs
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
ilemi
@ilemi
okay I'm caught up, it's much easier to follow than frames v1 (I think knowing frames v1 made it harder to shift mentally) does context still come with a signature/verification of some sort? And are there some /neynar frames v2 specific APIs or SDK functions I should know about?
1 reply
1 recast
21 reactions
Angel - Not A Bot
@sayangel
at least as of last week no context verification unfortunately and @rish tipped me off to this handy @neynar functionality specific to V2: https://docs.neynar.com/docs/send-notifications-to-frame-users basically they do analytics + notifications for you
2 replies
0 recast
1 reaction
ilemi
@ilemi
got it, would be nice to have verification on messages without forcing the user to click SIWF again haha
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
horsefacts 🚂
@horsefacts.eth
actions.signIn is seamless on mobile and much stronger form of authentication than app-signed context. (it's signed by the user's account rather than the app they're using). on web we push a notification to the user's mobile device. we may yet add some kind of signed context, but it's a tough distinction to make for devs to have two different kinds of signed data with different guarantees. https://docs.farcaster.xyz/developers/frames/v2/spec#actions-signin
0 reply
0 recast
3 reactions