Content pfp
Content
@
0 reply
0 recast
2 reactions

Dan Romero pfp
Dan Romero
@dwr.eth
Convince me I’m wrong: not a ton of incentive to be first to AA wallets given security risk / lack of Lindyness.
12 replies
1 recast
13 reactions

Matt Solomon pfp
Matt Solomon
@msolomon.eth
What’s the security and lindy issues you have in mind? A private key is the worst security model, and allowing users to change implementations/fallback handlers lets you adapt to whatever becomes the standard
2 replies
0 recast
0 reaction

horsefacts pfp
horsefacts
@horsefacts.eth
I participated in a c4 contest for one AA wallet and came away pretty spooked about the security surface area: it found deploy frontrunning, destroyable impls, gas refund exploits, several signature replays and bypasses. The core spec is simple, but there's a lot that can go wrong in the implementation and periphery.
1 reply
0 recast
4 reactions

Matt Solomon pfp
Matt Solomon
@msolomon.eth
That’s true, though if you start with a proven base like safe or argent a lot gets mitigated And to be fair I didn’t interpret “AA wallets” to mean 4337-like, but as general contract wallets which can be much simpler. I’m not super familiar with 4337 so perhaps it’s too complex to support my stance here
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction