horsefacts 🚂 on Warpcast

horsefacts 🚂 pfp

horsefacts 🚂

@horsefacts.eth

Problem: it’s too hard to build swap/token UIs. Several popular frames use embedded swap widgets that don't connect to the user’s wallet. We're exploring some ideas for "token actions" and seeking feedback from frame devs! https://warpcast.notion.site/DRAFT-Token-Actions-1966a6c0c101800abc99fed1720a73ca?pvs=74

23 replies

17 recasts

73 reactions

Stephan pfp

I like it! Would love to be able to specify the amount of token out but I recognize that’s probably a limitation of the swap API provider Is it possible for a client to specify whether a specific action is implemented or not? Would like to fall back to an in-frame flow in cases where native swap functionality isn’t available

1 reply

0 recast

10 reactions

Daniel Sinclair pfp

Daniel Sinclair

@danielsinclair

MetaMask has a new wallet_swapAsset RPC call that you could use as a fallback to Farcaster Wallet to push users from the Frame SDK into external wallets, rather than requiring the signing bounce-backs for Approval+Swap. The idea is that wallets (whether EOA or SCA) decide the tx flow (i.e. gasless or subsidized) for swaps https://github.com/MetaMask/metamask-improvement-proposals/blob/main/MIPs/mip-4.md

1 reply

0 recast

3 reactions

Jack Dishman pfp

would be huuuge to use the sdk actions to initiate a swap!

0 reply

0 recast

13 reactions

woj pfp

"add full range liquidity" would go a long way - find a token - get a list of largest liquidity pools (most likely one) - select it - if you have the right pair asset, add a slider how much you want to add in full range - ape

1 reply

0 recast

4 reactions

Samuel ツ pfp

@samuellhuber.eth

👀 From The notion: We support the following nonstandard extensions to [CAIP-19](https://github.com/ChainAgnostic/CAIPs/blob/main/CAIPs/caip-19.md): - `native` in addition to `slip44:<id>` for native tokens (e.g. ETH, SOL, POL, xDAI) - `solana:<numeric chain ID>` in addition to `solana:<genesis hash>` for Solana namespace

0 reply

0 recast

4 reactions

Pichi 🟪🍖🐹🎩 🍡🌸 pfp

Pichi 🟪🍖🐹🎩 🍡🌸

@apex777.eth @deployer You all might want to weigh in on this.

1 reply

0 recast

3 reactions

Sangohan.base.eth 🟠 pfp

Sangohan.base.eth 🟠

Personally, I used OnchainKit, and once the user’s wallet was linked to Warpcast, there were no particular issues. However, I haven’t tested it yet with the new integrated wallet on Warpcast I’ll get back to you with feedback once I do. But overall, the OnchainKit provider was effective when wrapped within the global provider.

0 reply

0 recast

2 reactions

phragg pfp

while we're talking about token actions, should stop at swap? potential for other CTA: Swap, Buy w/ fiat, Send

0 reply

0 recast

2 reactions

Tamrat pfp

o this would be really useful!

0 reply

0 recast

1 reaction

Jasper ⚡ pfp

@horsefacts.eth data-wise creating these views shouldn't be too hard https://protocol.zapper.xyz/docs/api/endpoints/onchain-prices

0 reply

0 recast

1 reaction

nezzar.eth pfp

I shipped swaps into the /astroblock frame last weekend for convenience for users and glad I didn't spend too much time on it once I saw the Wallet & swaps coming out. I 100% thought this would be something added at the SDK level as well :) One thing that would be neat tho is having some kind of fee split ! Frames would redirect some volume, would be fair to split it somehow https://app.astroblock.xyz/swap

0 reply

0 recast

1 reaction

limone.eth 🍋 pfp

limone.eth 🍋

"> await sdk.actions.swap({ sellToken, buyToken, sellAmount });" i think would be useful to allow swaps specifying either exactAmountIn or exactAmountOut also, if you allow developers getting a fee on the swap (or part of it) would be great

0 reply

0 recast

1 reaction

Garrett pfp

@saltorious.eth @natewestern

0 reply

0 recast

1 reaction

pol pfp

This would be awesome tbh @horsefacts.eth ! Any timeline for the Swap SDK? cc @no12

0 reply

0 recast

0 reaction

caso pfp

I see you chose the best meme out there $choochoo 🚂 🚂 jokes aside, that thing is so needed and as someone already mention it, I would add the possibility to choose exactAmountOut too

0 reply

0 recast

0 reaction

accountless.eth pfp

accountless.eth

@accountless.eth

0 reply

0 recast

0 reaction

Mirko 🔵🟡 .⌐◨-◨ pfp

Mirko 🔵🟡 .⌐◨-◨

Looks very nice! When the action starts from a frame with sdk, how will it go back to the frame after the swap? This is a full screen view, the frame is a sheet view

0 reply

0 recast

0 reaction

Wayne Worth pfp

@alongcamewayne

what happens post txn? will users be sent back to the page they were on? or could we send something like a successUrl as a param?

0 reply

0 recast

0 reaction

dylan pfp

this would be so sick to use as a frame dev! one small note here is it might be helpful to have some constructor or helper function in the frame sdk that takes in chain id/name and contract address and returns the properly formatted CAIP-19 URI

0 reply

0 recast

0 reaction