Content pfp
Content
@
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

Mishka pfp
Mishka
@0x0f
is anyone else having trouble deploying frames with frog? im not sure if i should disable devtools or what but I can't render my frames using WC validator but it shows up fine using devtools.
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

horsefacts pfp
horsefacts
@horsefacts.eth
Do the images have complex layouts? Frog encodes the image state in the image URL. If it gets too large the URL can exceed the max HTTP header size and start to fail. You can use a separate image handler to avoid this. (cc @dalechyn.eth who can correct me where I'm wrong, some of this might have changed) https://frog.fm/concepts/image-handler
3 replies
0 recast
4 reactions

Vladyslav Dalechyn pfp
Vladyslav Dalechyn
@dalechyn.eth
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

Mishka pfp
Mishka
@0x0f
Yea I got img handlers for the complex images. I'll see if the http headers check out still
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

Complexlity pfp
Complexlity
@complexlity
Yes. This was done because in the past, the function was called twice since there's two requests sent each time. 1 for the actual frame 1 for the image This means a frame that updates or toggles state will do so twice. Encode the image was the way to avoid this since it just decodes and return rather than run the entire frame handler
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction