Content
@
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
horsefacts
@horsefacts.eth
Farhackers: I’m planning to make some docs.farcaster.xyz updates before the event next week. What’s missing or needs an edit? On my list already: - Frame error messages - Actions spec - Multi step actions
6 replies
0 recast
27 reactions
dylan
@dylsteck.eth
Would be cool if frames was a section with its own sub-nav for - community links - separate pages for different parts of the spec(eg. a page for cast actions, etc)
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
CarCulture.eth🎩 🔵
@drivr.eth
Not sure if it belongs on FC docs but I really need better explanation of channels. I read FC norms but I’ve been busted twice and I do not understand why or where to raise an issue. I doubt I am alone.
0 reply
0 recast
2 reactions
typeof.eth 🔵
@typeof.eth
On the frames specs page, under the mint action section, it says “walletl” hehe
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
behkod.base.eth
@behkod.eth
- Why not also include FIPs in review stage under "FIPs"? [Yes, they are not Finalized & subject to change, but so are channels] - Including some protocol/client related WC channels(e.g /farcaster) under "Contributing" - Providing links to infra/API some service providers (Neynar, Airstack, .)
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
Semicolon
@semicolon.eth
Information on well known farcaster:// scheme URLs.
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Rob
@maxx
Add a y to the word “the” under claim or mint.
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction