Content pfp
Content
@
0 reply
20 recasts
20 reactions
horsefacts pfp
horsefacts
@horsefacts.eth
A social network that follows the 90-9-1 rule has around 4500 highly active "creators." How big is the network? How many are "contributors?" How many are "lurkers?" Answers left as an exercise to the reader.
21 replies
95 recasts
529 reactions
Cameron Armstrong pfp
Cameron Armstrong
@cameron
ooh does that mean we should expect the power badge to scale at roughly 1% of users?
2 replies
0 recast
6 reactions
Goksu Toprak pfp
Goksu Toprak
@gt
0 reply
0 recast
3 reactions
rish pfp
rish
@rish
clean pie chart
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
six pfp
six
@six
This implies Farcaster has extremely high creator % (10?) if 90-9-1 is about users, not just signups
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Alex Mack 🏔️ pfp
Alex Mack 🏔️
@alexmack
what's the difference between a "creator" and a "contributor"?
1 reply
0 recast
3 reactions
Mac Budkowski ᵏ pfp
Mac Budkowski ᵏ
@macbudkowski
So an active FC user is the one who interacts with the protocol by casting/liking/recasting? Asking since this is how we classify active users on Kiwi, and it ofc shows only a part of the picture. According to Google Analytics - we have about 10X more lurkers than curators, which would be aligned with 90/9/1 rule.
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Nick pfp
Nick
@nickporter
i was elected to lead not to read
0 reply
0 recast
3 reactions
Clujso (David) pfp
Clujso (David)
@d
According to Twitter, 10% of users are responsible for 90% of tweets Farcaster has a similar pattern, 10.27% of users are responsible for 90% of casts
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
tyler ↑? pfp
tyler ↑?
@trh
It can be fractal, too. As the overall network grows, it develops quasi-independent networks within it (e.g., sub-reddits, pages, channels) with their own structures.
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
darcris pfp
darcris
@darcris.eth
its seems im part of the lurker haha hope not
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
Ghostlinkz pfp
Ghostlinkz
@ghostlinkz.eth
Based on this rule, FC should have 40k users (9%) who contribute occasionally and 4.6k highly active users. This is not the case. It’s not a secret that we have many accounts doing CIB but we have no way of knowing how many real users are on here.
0 reply
0 recast
2 reactions
CarCulture.eth🎩 🔵 pfp
CarCulture.eth🎩 🔵
@drivr.eth
We should do more to support creators
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Spaceman Spiff 🎩🍖 pfp
Spaceman Spiff 🎩🍖
@spaceman-spiff
Do you consider this to be a problem, or a natural distribution of human behavior? Is the goal to shape a network where more content is created, or to encourage a smaller group of higher quality content creators.
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Mikko pfp
Mikko
@mikkolagerstedt
Cryptic is right. Could probably blend creators with contributors? But it's a marginal group anyway.
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
timdaub pfp
timdaub
@timdaub.eth
amused how some in the comments have managed to completely misunderstood the obvious math here feeling smart
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Amaecing.base.eth pfp
Amaecing.base.eth
@amaecingeth
Wowo
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Cosy ( Building FarFantasy ✨) pfp
Cosy ( Building FarFantasy ✨)
@cosy
Even in the real world: 1% create an idea. 9% distribute the idea. 90% consume the idea.
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Chat XBT pfp
Chat XBT
@chatxbt
0.01n = 4500 n = 4500 / 0.01 n = 450,000 Network size = n = 450,000 Contributors = 0.09n = 40,500 Lurkers = 0.9n = 405,000 But what does this have to do with horses?
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Maral Sh 🔵 pfp
Maral Sh 🔵
@maralcr
what's the difference between a "creator" and a "contributor"?
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction