Content pfp
Content
@
0 reply
20 recasts
22 reactions

horsefacts pfp
horsefacts
@horsefacts.eth
A social network that follows the 90-9-1 rule has around 4500 highly active "creators." How big is the network? How many are "contributors?" How many are "lurkers?" Answers left as an exercise to the reader.
101 replies
77 recasts
478 reactions

Cameron Armstrong pfp
Cameron Armstrong
@cameron
ooh does that mean we should expect the power badge to scale at roughly 1% of users?
7 replies
0 recast
17 reactions

Alex Mack ๐ŸŽฉ๐Ÿ– pfp
Alex Mack ๐ŸŽฉ๐Ÿ–
@alexmack
what's the difference between a "creator" and a "contributor"?
2 replies
0 recast
8 reactions

Mac Budkowski แต pfp
Mac Budkowski แต
@macbudkowski
So an active FC user is the one who interacts with the protocol by casting/liking/recasting? Asking since this is how we classify active users on Kiwi, and it ofc shows only a part of the picture. According to Google Analytics - we have about 10X more lurkers than curators, which would be aligned with 90/9/1 rule.
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

Nick pfp
Nick
@nickporter
i was elected to lead not to read
1 reply
0 recast
4 reactions

Goksu Toprak pfp
Goksu Toprak
@gt
0 reply
0 recast
4 reactions

David pfp
David
@d
According to Twitter, 10% of users are responsible for 90% of tweets Farcaster has a similar pattern, 10.27% of users are responsible for 90% of casts
0 reply
0 recast
2 reactions

thehilker ๐ŸŽฉโ†‘๐Ÿฅฑ  pfp
thehilker ๐ŸŽฉโ†‘๐Ÿฅฑ
@trh
It can be fractal, too. As the overall network grows, it develops quasi-independent networks within it (e.g., sub-reddits, pages, channels) with their own structures.
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

darcris.degen.eth๐ŸŽฉ๐Ÿ–๐ŸŽญ pfp
darcris.degen.eth๐ŸŽฉ๐Ÿ–๐ŸŽญ
@darcris.eth
its seems im part of the lurker haha hope not
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

ildi pfp
ildi
@ghostlinkz.eth
Based on this rule, FC should have 40k users (9%) who contribute occasionally and 4.6k highly active users. This is not the case. Itโ€™s not a secret that we have many accounts doing CIB but we have no way of knowing how many real users are on here.
0 reply
0 recast
7 reactions

Spaceman Spiff ๐ŸŽฉ๐Ÿ”ต๐Ÿ–๐ŸŽช pfp
Spaceman Spiff ๐ŸŽฉ๐Ÿ”ต๐Ÿ–๐ŸŽช
@spaceman-spiff
Do you consider this to be a problem, or a natural distribution of human behavior? Is the goal to shape a network where more content is created, or to encourage a smaller group of higher quality content creators.
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

rish pfp
rish
@rish
clean pie chart
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

timdaub pfp
timdaub
@timdaub.eth
amused how some in the comments have managed to completely misunderstood the obvious math here feeling smart
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

six pfp
six
@six
This implies Farcaster has extremely high creator % (10?) if 90-9-1 is about users, not just signups
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

Cosy pfp
Cosy
@cosy
Even in the real world: 1% create an idea. 9% distribute the idea. 90% consume the idea.
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

ใ“ใ˜ใ‹ใกใ‚ƒใ‚“ (kozika)โœจ pfp
ใ“ใ˜ใ‹ใกใ‚ƒใ‚“ (kozika)โœจ
@kozikachan
I feel that quite a few have been buried without attention, 4,500 of them hardly feel like they are out in the open. But there are a lot of great creatives out there.
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

Mikko  pfp
Mikko
@mikkolagerstedt
Cryptic is right. Could probably blend creators with contributors? But it's a marginal group anyway.
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

gittu.eth pfp
gittu.eth
@gittu
Let's solve it together!
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

Staffy pfp
Staffy
@cryptonaut0
Fun math! Let's solve it together.
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

ELON MUSK ๐Ÿ–๐ŸŽฉ๐Ÿฆ•๐ŸŽญ pfp
ELON MUSK ๐Ÿ–๐ŸŽฉ๐Ÿฆ•๐ŸŽญ
@kakashi-hatake
+100 ๐Ÿ”ฅ FIRE reward sent. Please check your balance.
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction