Content pfp
Content
@
https://warpcast.com/~/channel/heroglyphs
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Heroglyphs pfp
Heroglyphs
@heroglyphs
What type of Stakers should be recognized? https://paragraph.xyz/@ethstaker/define-solo-staker
7 replies
8 recasts
45 reactions
hunter pfp
hunter
@bfresh
IMO those with a machine at home that have the full amount of ETH deposited I think Rocket pool stakers maybe but at what point do you draw the line
0 reply
0 recast
6 reactions
jasperthefriendlyghost.Eth pfp
jasperthefriendlyghost.Eth
@jasper-eth
We should support maximum censorship resistance. Independent operators who make decisions on clients, relays, hardware, and software are what keep Ethereum decentralized and are the ones I think deserve to be recognized/rewarded.
0 reply
2 recasts
8 reactions
Ken Smith pfp
Ken Smith
@nextblock
Fully decentralized, permissionless and trustless staking protocols like Rocket Pool provide all of the independence to individual Node Operators while at the same time reducing the financial, barrier to validating and protecting the blockchain by about 65%.
0 reply
2 recasts
5 reactions
Ken Smith pfp
Ken Smith
@nextblock
I strongly believe that Home Stakers should be viewed nearly the same level as Solo Stakers. If the intent was to decentralize the Ethereum Blockchain, one of the leading barriers to creating more Solo Stakers is the financial cost of acquiring 32 ETH.
0 reply
1 recast
6 reactions
NelsonRodMar pfp
NelsonRodMar
@nelsonrodmar
Solo and Home staker, both are doing it at home avoiding centralisation in AWS or other. The home staker doesn't have necessary the money to be a Solo but he choose to do it at home so he take risk (money, slashing, home trouble) and help decentralise the network.
0 reply
0 recast
5 reactions
agrimony↑🎩 pfp
agrimony↑🎩
@agrimony.eth
Agreed. The important distinction here are those that have executive control over their node and those who don't imo.
0 reply
0 recast
4 reactions
Waq pfp
Waq
@waq
I like Nixo's classification of solo stakers, home stakers, and remote stakers. They should all have equal representation in this situation. That includes Rocket Pool node operators as home stakers.
0 reply
0 recast
2 reactions
Tritium pfp
Tritium
@0xtritium
Seems to me like an individual running 1 or a small group of validators at home or on AWS is a "solo staker". What we want is a wider group of validators. Maybe part of what is needed is some kind of an anti-sybil/proof of humanity solution like Gitcoin Passport and/or Worldcoin.
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
Fitz pfp
Fitz
@fits
Everyone with Sovereign control of a stake (portion or full 32Eth) ideally running a machine locally but can also be hosted(maybe). @rocketpool homestakers should be the boundary of what qualifies
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
Deepcryptodive pfp
Deepcryptodive
@giel
Solo stakers, home stakers, & remote stakers sounds about right!
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
Web3Builder.news pfp
Web3Builder.news
@w3buildernews.eth
All individual physical node stakers, as they help decentralize the network.
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
swuk pfp
swuk
@swuk
Solo, Home and to a lesser extent remote due to the centralisation into cloud services.
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Nachshol.eth pfp
Nachshol.eth
@thewatcher
I started from being a normie using Binance to running 2 NUCs from home thanks to Rocketpool. IMO RP is a flag barer for ETH decentralization and staking from home and should definitely be included in this initiative
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Sheen pfp
Sheen
@sheen
Definitely those with a machine at home. Those are the ones following ethereum ethos and contributing to decentralization. Doesn't matter if solo or using another protocol, like Rocketpool. Rocketpool, the project, for example, has thousands of home nodes, and they can provide a verified list of those nodes to you.
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Human pfp
Human
@machaman
All should, with fair proportion and the right incentives.
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
cfb pfp
cfb
@christophe
Anyone running and controlling a node with money at stake? Rocketpool def applies in my (biased) opinion :)
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Tritium pfp
Tritium
@0xtritium
In terms of rocket or other solutions that allow validating without being "rich". It's great to provide opportunity to people. It's important that validator operators have control over the software they run. Maybe some minor percentage of validators to use such tech?
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction