Content
@
0 reply
20 recasts
20 reactions
KMac
@kmacb.eth
Am I the only one triggered by the tech talk. As soon as we step out of our tiny bubble nobody knows wtf we are saying. “Frames V2? What was V1? Should I care? What did I miss? Damn the crypto bro stuff is confusing.” We can do better. We have to do better. Let’s try to get a general consensus on naming around frames v2. I’ve proposed calling it Frame Technology. eg Devs build apps using Frame Technology. Or Farcaster Frame Technology & mini-apps (not a fan of calling a teams work mini but one battle at a time). There must be naming gurus here? What say you? kmac stfu is also valid response
3 replies
1 recast
9 reactions
nicholas 🧨
@nicholas
time to rename Frames v2 -> MiniApps
1 reply
0 recast
5 reactions
Harris
@harris-
@samuellhuber.eth coded
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
Samuel ツ
@samuellhuber.eth
💜 yes our docs mention frames v2 as Farcaster mini apps 👍😆
0 reply
0 recast
2 reactions