hanriver
@hanriver
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
0 reply
13 recasts
13 reactions
0 reply
11 recasts
12 reactions
0 reply
12 recasts
12 reactions
0 reply
7 recasts
8 reactions
0 reply
16 recasts
17 reactions
0 reply
10 recasts
18 reactions
0 reply
16 recasts
13 reactions
0 reply
14 recasts
14 reactions
0 reply
7 recasts
9 reactions
0 reply
11 recasts
13 reactions
0 reply
13 recasts
15 reactions
0 reply
14 recasts
15 reactions
One meta belief I have, is that I think "on the face pursuing idealistic objective A, but actually being tilted toward selfish objective B" is better than "openly pursuing objective B".
Many seem to believe the opposite, typically saying something like "at least the latter is honest".
I feel like what this misses, is that maintaining the face of pursuing idealistic objective A, and using A to coordinate a large coalition, is a pretty big speed bump against attempts to pursue B too brazenly. When "the mask comes off", things actually become much worse, and strategies that pursue B at high costs to other values (including A, and also often general human decency) become unlocked.
Are there any good arguments against this intuition I have? (Whether generalized, or about specific situations) 0 reply
12 recasts
13 reactions
0 reply
15 recasts
18 reactions
0 reply
14 recasts
17 reactions
0 reply
12 recasts
14 reactions
0 reply
11 recasts
12 reactions
0 reply
12 recasts
13 reactions
0 reply
7 recasts
9 reactions