Content pfp
Content
@
0 reply
21 recasts
21 reactions

Haardik pfp
Haardik
@haardikkk
Syncing Teleport onchain from scratch and came across weirdness In block 114523861, there is a storage Rent event from someone which has fid 38053300632633822045410405651412025795888287900 How is this even possible? This broke Teleport a bit - working on fixing it, but how does this fid even exist? cc @v
9 replies
1 recast
13 reactions

Haardik pfp
Haardik
@haardikkk
https://optimistic.etherscan.io/tx/0x90aae2bb584a2b77abc77cbb53e83432a153ddc8bbfed8ba849e736bfa9386e7#eventlog
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

Varun Srinivasan pfp
Varun Srinivasan
@v
If itโ€™s a valid fid then you can either : 1. Keep track of it now 2. Reindex the event when the fid is added Cc @sanjay and @horsefacts.eth
2 replies
0 recast
1 reaction

ncitron.eth pfp
ncitron.eth
@ncitron.eth
Taking a look at the contract it does not validate that the fid exists. A question that comes up is whether this fid should still be credited with a storage unit, as it is possible that rent could be bought and then the fid created later. I doubt this is specified but probably should be for consistency across clients.
1 reply
0 recast
3 reactions

vincent pfp
vincent
@pixel
wow damn, you're actually right fid 38053300632633822045410405651412025795888287900
1 reply
0 recast
3 reactions

zoo pfp
zoo
@zoo
furreal tho could it be related to the gift someone storage frame? was one of the first to be tested i think
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

zoo pfp
zoo
@zoo
someone from the future is trying to cast at us ๐Ÿ˜ณ
1 reply
0 recast
2 reactions

Mariyana ๐ŸŽฉ๐Ÿ–๐Ÿ”ต๐Ÿ”ฎ pfp
Mariyana ๐ŸŽฉ๐Ÿ–๐Ÿ”ต๐Ÿ”ฎ
@mariyana
91 $DEGEN
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

henry pfp
henry
@henry
the future is now
1 reply
0 recast
3 reactions

avi pfp
avi
@avichalp
if the new version of contracts adds in validations then we can remove the check from teleport but until then we need to have a check
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction