I’ve had this debate with friends many times: are there conditions that must be met before you call yourself a “philosopher”?

Although my undergraduate degree was in philosophy, I don’t think a degree is required. 

However, I do agree there should be some minimum. Possibly a standard of reasoning or…

Crypto and NFT degen. I trade on vibes and vibes alone. Jeets out Chads in. 
*performance art* @Mecha_Kong on X

… maybe a requirement that your philosophy is published (doesn’t have to be academic) in a manner that allows peer review, comment, and argument 

What do you all think?

Yes, I think that’s a good point. It implies some outward communication. And I think it also implies some quality of reasoning. 

Someone who asserts arguments that are not sound, or at least that are plausible, probably shouldn’t be given the credibility of someone who asserts valid and sounds arguments

The philosopher tag is bestowed upon you by others. You're not socially valid as a philosopher until there are enough people who think of you as a philosopher. It's similar with authors or artists, to an extent.

That's not the case for a physicist who may be completely unknown but still very much a physicist.