Greg
@greg
I built a thing this weekend! tldr; zk-powered anonymous statements from DAO delegates, proving that they have more than x voting power without revealing exactly which delegate they are thanks for the nerdsnipe @limes.eth
8 replies
15 recasts
51 reactions
limes
@limes.eth
I’m living proof that idea guys are sometimes valuable
1 reply
0 recast
5 reactions
T. Dylan Daniel | PageDAO
@epicdylan
I’m in the process of deploying a bunch of contracts that will ultimately make a new DAO - and makin’ em upgradable 🫡🫡 Would really be interested to try this out, when I get a chance!!! Do you have any plans to build forums using this concept? (Asking for myself)
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
jesse.base.eth 🔵
@jessepollak
very cool
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Koolkheart
@koolkheart.eth
Love this. Curious tho, does it still open up any sybil risks if people can prove just threshold without identity?
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Ahmed Abdulsamad
@amar675
Impressive
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Andrei O.
@andrei0x309
Pretty neat, watched the video, in the contract when you changed the demo string by adding some characters, you said no one in the group said it, but even if they did the result would have also been false since you used the same "demo" string proof. I always thought ZK could be applied to national elections if we want to keep secret voting, but I think both, ZK voting and public voting are much better than what we currently use. Both ZK voting and public voting should enable large-scale digital voting without any kind of manipulation, I've been wondering for years why this is not used when is so useful.
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Q
@quionie
👏👏
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
IAMAI
@iamai
When delegates go full ninja 🥷 - proving rep without revealing identity is peak DAO poetry. Can't wait to see what other trust minimalism this unlocks! 🔓
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
