Content pfp
Content
@
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

Greg pfp
Greg
@greg
11 replies
26 recasts
122 reactions

Greg pfp
Greg
@greg
@woj.eth i think supercast polls let the same person vote infinite times ?
2 replies
0 recast
0 reaction

​woj ツ pfp
​woj ツ
@woj.eth
deranged, "no" only i haven't seen a read receipt in 5 years
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

Dan Romero pfp
Dan Romero
@dwr.eth
I voted yes and so should you
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

Sam (crazy candle person) ✦  pfp
Sam (crazy candle person) ✦
@samantha
Y’all are so nosy NO 😭
1 reply
0 recast
6 reactions

frdysk.framedl.eth pfp
frdysk.framedl.eth
@frdysk
hell no, why would you introduce drama, read receipts are drama kings and queens who got nothing better to do but rubber necking with longhorn ears
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

Dan Simmons pfp
Dan Simmons
@simmons
Read receipts are toxic, I will die on this hill 🙂
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

axek pfp
axek
@axek
NO! Don't be like everyone else. I think that's actually a killer feature when people don't know have you read the message already or not. That's a part of privacy to be able to not show everyone I've read their messages. One should not feel obligated to reply every DM they've read just because the other side is wating
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

Gabby 🎩 pfp
Gabby 🎩
@papi
having them available + the *choice* to enable them?
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

chet pfp
chet
@cosmicblend
no for me
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

VeinyMilkersMMM pfp
VeinyMilkersMMM
@assburgers
group owner determines
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction