Content pfp
Content
@
0 reply
20 recasts
20 reactions

Dan | Icebreaker pfp
Dan | Icebreaker
@web3pm
Look again: the cast is now diamonds. The first Cast has been /witnessed in its raw form to serve as an onchain verifiable attestation. No data transformation required. In addition to being more efficient architecturally, this opens up the ability for anyone to retroactively make any cast - past or future - function as an onchain verifiable attestation. This model extends to making any cryptographically verifiable data (whether web2 or web3) retroactively verifiable onchain under any schema. https://easscan.org/offchain/attestation/view/0x640feccf1388c125f3025c7e1c7e7cd39c6497936579f7ba4d6096d4f7fb5f58 https://paragraph.xyz/@icebreakerlabs/casts-vs-attestations-which-is-better
4 replies
30 recasts
88 reactions

Gramajođź‘˝ pfp
Gramajođź‘˝
@gramajo.eth
random thought that came to mind as I talk about this in my newsletter. What happens when the cast starts disappearing because people arent buying more storage? do we lose the attestation due to pruning?
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

Dan | Icebreaker pfp
Dan | Icebreaker
@web3pm
Yup, great question! We asked similar before concluding this is a durable design It’s similar to ipfs in that as long as one person hosts a copy, it can be recovered. And because we witness them, its provenance can also be verified onchain
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction