Content
@
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Gon
@gon1
Some key points about Fuel historical airdrop method (low value interactions + farm + multi) is dying. Upcoming projects are exploring new ways of distributing tokens and many opportunities will pop out in the coming months. Fuel choose to go with deposit to earn model which discourage Sybils and encourage large liquidity owners to commit their funds. Fuel is literally using the Blast model because they deployed a contract on Ethereum mainnet with no Fuel mainnet at this moment (meaning no official mainnet bridge). The deposit contract is a GNOSIS SAFE multi sig contract which private keys are held by anonymous entities (according to Fuel), i reviewed the audit report, it seems strong with no major security issues. If you decide to put your money in this contract, you should as always know that even if audited, a contract can be hacked and no 0 risk exists in this ecosystem. Last thing i wanted to point out, there's still a very small chance that testnet interactions might be rewarded somehow.
2 replies
10 recasts
45 reactions
blessinggodwin
@blessinggodwin
Interesting insights on Fuel's distribution model and security measures. Always important to stay cautious in the DeFi space. Thanks for sharing!
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
Gon
@gon1
Thank you for your thoughtful comment! I completely agree—while audits are an important step toward ensuring security, staying vigilant is essential for users in the fast-evolving crypto space. It’s exciting to see innovative approaches to token distribution emerge, as they can help shape a more efficient and equitable ecosystem. Do you have any specific distribution models that stand out to you? Would love to hear your thoughts!
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
