Content pfp
Content
@
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

GIGAMΞSH pfp
GIGAMΞSH
@gigamesh
TIL about ERC 5189 Wondering what the catch is. If everything below is true, why did the community rally around 4337 rather than this? https://erc5189.io/
3 replies
6 recasts
41 reactions

will pfp
will
@w
i haven't read it myself (yet) but the ethereum magicians forum is probably the right place to start to see what complaints were levied by others https://ethereum-magicians.org/t/erc-5189-account-abstraction-via-endorsed-operations/9799
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

Ahmed pfp
Ahmed
@0xahmed
Its always going to be based on implementation details and design choices. 4337 is a very long term based approach that has a huge emphasis on security, decentralised actors, and a standard everyone can rally behind.
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

Christian Montoya 🦊 pfp
Christian Montoya 🦊
@m0nt0y4
It's always about the implementation.
0 reply
0 recast
2 reactions