Data

Introducing: Seemore qDAU Score 👀

If we want Farcaster to be the infra for a new social internet...

We gotta build public goods to accelerate alt clients AND those goods can't be held captive by the incentives of crypto giants  

Plus scores are fun to argue about 🫡

Introducing: Seemore qDAU Score 👀

If we want Farcaster to be the infra for a new social internet...

We gotta build public goods to accelerate alt clients AND those goods can't be held captive by the incentives of crypto giants  

Plus scores are fun to argue about 🫡

https://seemore.tv/creatortools/qdauscore

Glad we are talking about it. Im mainly curious to see if we can establishing a minimum score that would qualify someone as a qDAU or not. A few thoughts: 

1) Follower counts mean very little to me. I don't believe I actually have 20.8k real people following me right now. So I wouldn't use this.

weird internet kid. helping Creators with /seemore. yapping on /okbanger. curating in /creators and /cameron. dev + veteran + HBS. 
seemore.tv/cameron 🫡

@cameron 

4) Many casts get high engagement from low quality accounts atm. So I think who takes an action on your casts should also matter.

5) Im not sure if your most recent 20 casts is the best representation of you. What made you go with 20 instead of 100 lets say?

@cameron 

2) I also think replies are the most important action, but not all replies are equal imo. Reply text length might be useful to consider. 

3) Quote casts and recasts should hold equal weighting

We fully agree!

While this is a fun fun, we think the most relevant “score” to Casters trying to cast well is a self comp across time albeit still weighted somehow against temporal followers AND against the relative intra-channel performance

Rn we just use followers to slightly handicap larger account scores