Content pfp
Content
@
https://warpcast.com/~/channel/coins
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

jesse.base.eth 🔵 pfp
jesse.base.eth 🔵
@jessepollak
try to argue against content coins from first principles. if a video on tiktok has millions of views, it has value. why should a single platform control that value? why shouldn't that value be explicit? why shouldn't the creator benefit from that value? seems good to me.
41 replies
25 recasts
167 reactions

Garrett pfp
Garrett
@garrett
Don’t think coining content is bad and i love the experimentation but here’s a steel man argument: 1. Not all value is capturable or should be 2. Tokenizing content could kill what’s makes the content valuable - memes benefit from remixing, free sharing and virality 3. Tokens can misalign incentives - do we end up with most content coins being predominantly digital spam, scams and engagement hacks All of these seem like valid criticisms. I don’t think attention and culture should always be monetized. Not all value is ownable
1 reply
0 recast
14 reactions

Reid DeRamus pfp
Reid DeRamus
@reidtandy
Great feedback! Could you say more about #2? And for #3, if it's spam or scams, do you think those would actually gain momentum? One maybe related note on #3 I've been thinking about: most of the top writers on Substack aren't necessarily the best writers, but they are usually very good at marketing & growth.
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction