Kriepto 🇧🇪🫡 pfp
Kriepto 🇧🇪🫡
@farcastor.eth
Gm frens. 🤗 Ok, someone has to do it. Long before the TGE, I had already set the price close to that of Bonsai, even lower due to the larger supply. Some laughed at me, others were angry. Today, it’s finally happening — they have roughly the same price. So, I think it’s time for a comparison. 😇😉 And who better to leave this to than ChatGPT for a neutral analysis? The conclusion is below, (first comment), but as for my own opinion, I can already tell you this, frens: I fully agree with it. I also opt for the safe and long-term investment. And isn’t that exactly what our CEO said in his last post and the Call? Not a quick-money-making coin, but a solid long-term vision. HODL, frens. Even ChatGPT says so. 🙂 What is your view or comparison between both coins? Have a nice day, everyone. 👋🙂
2 replies
1 recast
40 reactions
Kriepto 🇧🇪🫡 pfp
Kriepto 🇧🇪🫡
@farcastor.eth
ChatGPT: If I had to choose between Phaver Coin and Bonsai Token, I would look at my investment strategy and risk tolerance. Phaver Coin offers potential due to its larger scale and integration with multiple social networks like Lens Protocol and Farcaster. If you believe in the future of decentralized social networks with broad adoption, Phaver Coin could be a good choice, especially since it has a larger community and reach. The downside is the high maximum supply, which could put pressure on the price per token. Bonsai Token, on the other hand, has a much smaller maximum supply and targets a niche of developers and pioneers in on-chain social interaction. This means the token has more potential for price appreciation if demand increases, due to its limited availability. The downside is that it is less well-known and more niche, meaning it relies on a smaller community for success. If I were willing to take more risk and speculation, and I believe in the potential of smaller projects operating in a ni…
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction