Content pfp
Content
@
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

EulerLagrange.eth pfp
EulerLagrange.eth
@eulerlagrange.eth
Kinda feel like using a different name for the app and protocol was a mistake. Non-crypto natives gonna be confused
12 replies
0 recast
11 reactions

Jess Sloss !!! pfp
Jess Sloss !!!
@jess
really? I think it was essential. Beyond making fully understanding the ecosystem a bit more complicated, whats the risk you see?
3 replies
0 recast
3 reactions

EulerLagrange.eth pfp
EulerLagrange.eth
@eulerlagrange.eth
I understand the reasoning behind. The reasoning is very crypto native though. I find myself joining “join FC”, and then I get asked “then why’d you send me a WC link”. Then I explain the whole client diversity thing and then I lose them. Less to explain is just easier for everyone :)
2 replies
0 recast
2 reactions

EulerLagrange.eth pfp
EulerLagrange.eth
@eulerlagrange.eth
God damn typos man. Saying*
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

Jess Sloss !!! pfp
Jess Sloss !!!
@jess
Got it. I think the people will start calling it warpcast and the vast majority of people will use WC as the client. Other apps will leverage the FC social graph, but users will identity with using the specific app (niche) and not think about FC at all
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction