Content
@
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
EulerLagrange.eth
@eulerlagrange.eth
Kinda feel like using a different name for the app and protocol was a mistake. Non-crypto natives gonna be confused
12 replies
0 recast
11 reactions
Jess Sloss !!!
@jess
really? I think it was essential. Beyond making fully understanding the ecosystem a bit more complicated, whats the risk you see?
3 replies
0 recast
3 reactions
EulerLagrange.eth
@eulerlagrange.eth
I understand the reasoning behind. The reasoning is very crypto native though. I find myself joining “join FC”, and then I get asked “then why’d you send me a WC link”. Then I explain the whole client diversity thing and then I lose them. Less to explain is just easier for everyone :)
2 replies
0 recast
2 reactions
EulerLagrange.eth
@eulerlagrange.eth
God damn typos man. Saying*
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Jess Sloss !!!
@jess
Got it. I think the people will start calling it warpcast and the vast majority of people will use WC as the client. Other apps will leverage the FC social graph, but users will identity with using the specific app (niche) and not think about FC at all
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction