Content pfp
Content
@
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

Brunny.eth pfp
Brunny.eth
@brunny
The first AMA on the zk channel will be this Thursday, Feb 8, at 17:00 GMT. @zac-aztec of PLONK / Aztec fame will be answering questions. Fun fact, Zac was a particle physicist at CERN before becoming a self-taught cryptographer reply with questions below, Zac will pick the best ones to answer on Thursday ⬇️
23 replies
21 recasts
118 reactions

EulerLagrange.eth pfp
EulerLagrange.eth
@eulerlagrange.eth
This one is longer, I had a HIGH LEVEL idea on how to improve proving speeds. It’s simple Assume we have a ZKP scheme with a tunable parameter for the security strength. Where: High security -> Slow Low security -> Fast We can tune the parameter to be faster, and curb the security by measuring proving duration…
2 replies
0 recast
3 reactions

Brian 🎩 pfp
Brian 🎩
@br1an
I actually talked about this at zkSummit 9! The annoying thing is that, at least for STARKs, you don't have as many useful levers as you might like. You can end up with 50 bits of security instead of 100 and only gain a 2x speedup - still, it's a really promising idea in my mind.
1 reply
0 recast
3 reactions

EulerLagrange.eth pfp
EulerLagrange.eth
@eulerlagrange.eth
Interesting, at least the idea has legs. I have a few ideas around this, but won’t have the time to go deep into it for awhile. I’m going to hunt down this talk, thanks!
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction