Zora

In celebration of the one-year anniversary of the Zora protocol and the initial release of zorb, we invite you to mint a commemorative NFT for your collection. Minting is open for 20+22 hours on New Years Day and cements your status as an early supporter of Zora.


[zorb.dev](https://zorb.dev/) by [zora.co](https://zora.co).

ZORBS by ZORA

to be 100% clear: if you are a creator, or artist, or anything, and you coin something on @zora to express your creativity and you are attacked or maligned, I will stand by you and defend you

you deserve to earn from your work — don't let anyone tell you otherwise

@base builder #001; onchain cities w/ OAK & city3

what if a user could opt in to having every top level post on fc instantly become a coin?

could remove the stigma around what’s “worthy” of becoming a coin and lets the market decide - most won’t be worth much and that’s ok, some will be worth lots

from the art perspective, if every post was a coin, i feel i could still share the art itself as a 1/1 or edition bc the post feels different enough from the art itself, and i didn’t “choose” each thing i coined

feels like a win/win, and less paralyzing for the person trying to decide “what do i coin”, and feel like it would give more flexibility to artists

cc @dwr.eth @jacob

investor, photographer, nomad, exploring onchain & exploring the 🌎

for onchain photography, i still lean heavily towards 1/1s or editions

when i mint/collect a photo onchain i’m thinking about long term legacy, something that could potentially last 100s of yrs

personally feel an nft represents the photo itself, whereas a liquid coin doesn’t

some thoughts

for many types of content, it makes sense to auto have a coin or mass abundance, 100 pennies still = $1

however, bucketing artists in “coining everything” feels off - i am no expert, but art has been around for millennia and it’s often valued based on scarcity, emotion, feel

i don’t believe abundance and scarcity are mutually exclusive in this new world, both should exist onchain for various purposes

global liquidity benefits 1/1s, open editions, and coins

ALL of these are ownership breakthroughs, not just coins

1/1 ~= art in an exhibition/museum

open edition ~= postcards/stamps (ht @wanderloots.eth)

coin ~= fractionalized representation of content

my whole point is to say there isn’t one “right” way - and i don’t think we as a collective whole should push for a certain way over another, the goal is choice/freedom

a tiktok video? prob great as a coin!
art/photography? i personally lean towards editions or 1/1

the key is choice where the main onchain distribution lives

agree, think it’s important to distinguish between content like a one sentence cast, or a tik tok video, versus art (or at least what i personally view as “art”). they’re fundamentally different imo

shared some thoughts in these two casts!:

Photographer | Artist | PhD🫀🤘
/mountains /alexmack 
👉 alexmack.ca

agree, think it’s important to distinguish between content like a one sentence cast, or a tik tok video, versus art (or at least what i personally view as “art”). they’re fundamentally different imo

shared some thoughts in these two casts!:
https://warpcast.com/eriks/0x9774a83f

https://warpcast.com/eriks/0x695f25e2

but if you want the art to be sold why not just mint it as an ERC 721 or 1155? Social media is a vehicle to share and attract attention, which then can support real collecting of art... is there really a need to tokenize a post as a means to have it "sold"? 

I dunno the model isn't for me (for art anyway)

curious about crypto UX. occasionally fun(ny)

This is brilliant 

Feels like the right balance of expression and discovery.

I personally feel like there is no need to turn everything we share online into a coin.

onchain-blocks

added to the list those who requested to be added 

the way to use it is replying to your own cast with:

@ diamondlabs obigen cast COINSYMBOL your coin name

it will convert your cast in a coin

just built this 😅

https://warpcast.com/jvaleska.eth/0x7543c790