51% fork doesn't make sense because then it can't be used in the honest minority case, this defeats the purpose of the good faith fork

Hey @nouncil 
I'd like to suggest that you improve how you put up proposals:

This prop says nothing about the thinking behind it, why basically disabling the fork makes sense to you, who are some point people to discuss this with, etc.

working on nouns protocol ⌐◨-◨ https://mirror.xyz/verbsteam.eth

Noun 730 | Based & Optimistic Ξthereum Ξnjoyoor | founder @thenounsquare, Zero Rights Reserved Podcast (ZeroPod.xyz) & the /yellow collective on BASE | ⌐◨-◨ ᖽ

Setting aside whether we should disable the fork, seems like @nouncil lead by example with very well written props. This one provides no context or arguments for the change!

I agree with you. I actually missed this vote because I was afk busy with some things and I'm actually confused how it came to be or why it passed. I don't support raising the threshold that high, as it would make the fork useless as minority protection.

accelerating agritech. empowering communities. ending hunger.
Founder: theCityFarmers.org

| sovereign | post-rich | 🇺🇸/acc | remilio

There's still time to take it down and do it properly, the better move at this point IMO

whoever submitted the poll that passed for Nouncil to submit a proposal didn’t bother to actually write the proposal

after ~2 weeks, this got put forward for the sake of keeping the machine moving and fulfilling our obligations to ourselves

not a good look though

disagree that parameter change props *need* to campaign on chain.   bikeshedding the threshold % is a pretty mind-numbing exercise I think we can all agree 

tho if interested in helping shape nouncil governance it’s easy enough to get skin in the game 🙏