Content pfp
Content
@
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

Lisa pfp
Lisa
@eellaoh99
Title: CompoundDAO's Setback: A Catalyst for Voting Bloc Entropy Propose On July 28, 2024, CompoundDAO’s governance suffered a blow when Proposal 289 allowed a group known as the “Golden Boys” to take control of $24 million from the DAO’s treasury. Though the proposal wasn’t inherently malicious, it exposed a serious flaw in the DAO’s governance system—voter apathy. With only 7% of token holders participating, this case sheds light on the limitations of existing decentralization metrics like the Nakamoto Coefficient, which often misses risks related to how voting power is controlled.
4 replies
0 recast
2 reactions

Lisa pfp
Lisa
@eellaoh99
2. Enter Voting Bloc Entropy (VBE) A new approach, called Voting Bloc Entropy (VBE), addresses these gaps. The metric was proposed by Andrés Fábrega, Jay Yu, Amy Zhao, and Ari Juels. It is their creation and part of their research on DAO governance and decentralization.
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

Lisa pfp
Lisa
@eellaoh99
2.1. What is VBE? VBE doesn’t just look at token distribution—it analyzes voting patterns and forms clusters called “voting blocs.” These blocs highlight how power is aggregated within a DAO, making it easier to detect centralization risks. In the CompoundDAO scenario, VBE would treat the Golden Boys as a unified voting bloc, regardless of how many wallets they used. VBE would also recognize the significant number of inactive token holders as part of an “inactivity whale,” representing a massive block of non-participation. By factoring in both active and inactive blocs, VBE provides a clearer view of real governance decentralization.
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction