Content
@
0 reply
18 recasts
21 reactions
ionspired
@ionspired
bold move boss @jessepollak https://x.com/ionspired/status/1913091461324697656?s=46 https://x.com/ionspired/status/1913091461324697656?s=46&t=DkpTH-M8giZcEtNZ3-dTMQ https://media.tenor.com/MDde3EZaSrAAAAAC/the-manager-robert-de-niro
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
eatzebugs🎩
@eatzebugs
if anything, it's proving that when devs abandon their creations, everything goes to shit hyperfast. imagine creating a "content coin" on farcaster and then ghosting. Unreal chutzpah.
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
ionspired
@ionspired
Isn’t it most of the cases? a deployer gets not satisfied with the engagement ($20k cap or $100k cap — depends on the deployer, its subjective), then he takes a decision: shall I provide more commitment or move on to new concepts which would make me more confident to commit and develop this my entire life, you know. The variety of cases is spectral, not b&w. I believe the flexible flow (collect social feedback first, commit second) is more organic, efficient building-wise and boosts experimentation, practice. If the only legit coin is the coin with long term commitment given before the deployment (and perfectionism before the feedback) the blockchain adoption will slow down critically. The one specific consequence of a default anarchy for tokens is that it delivers the message: do your homework research or don’t trade. I love the idea it can raise our common intelligence level significantly. Proactive trading is sexy
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
