MetaGame

I'm in a Facebook group chat associated with the channel "Believe In Reality". They said, "Nothing wrong with having your personal beliefs. Beliefs are a natural right and freedom."

I responded, "I reject your relativistic viewpoint that beliefs are a freedom.

"If you're an actual scientist, your beliefs are dictated by reality.

"There is a certain amount of wiggle room in the truth of the evidence of how reality is, but certain truths are inalienable:

* "Trump is a liar.
* "Climate change is happening.
* "Crypto & Web3 are going to disrupt some stuff.
* "¡WAGMI!: (¡𝘞𝘦 𝘈𝘳𝘦 𝘎𝘰𝘪𝘯𝘨 𝘵𝘰 𝘔𝘢𝘬𝘦 𝘐𝘵!)
* "Yahweh doesn't exist."

They responded, "You would have to define what you mean by 'reality'. … Yahweh not existing, is an example of a personal belief by you."

To which I gave a dissertation on Kohlberg's Stages of Moral Development & why I believe my viewpoint is structurally superior to theirs.

1/?