Content pfp
Content
@
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

Dan Romero pfp
Dan Romero
@dwr.eth
More aggressive, proactive spam filtering would have prevented wowow meta. What if spam is an untapped meme energy source?
10 replies
0 recast
20 reactions

🗿 pfp
🗿
@bias
We’ve been trying to reach you about your car’s extended wowow.
0 reply
0 recast
12 reactions

Darryl Yeo 🛠️ pfp
Darryl Yeo 🛠️
@darrylyeo
interesting showowow thought
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

Cyber Shakti 🎩😇😈💃 pfp
Cyber Shakti 🎩😇😈💃
@cybershakti
You gaaaiz need to tune into Instagram and search for the wowowowowow trend taking over SEA
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

𒂠_𒍣𒅀_𒊑 pfp
𒂠_𒍣𒅀_𒊑
@m-j-r
wowow, fwiw I think it's discontinuous. better to append a "this is low effort" meta & play out the memetic cycle, than to filter & make engagement even more nonfluid. but in both cases the narrative should have some sort of low effort dialogue, not mutually exclusive to qDAU.
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

vincent pfp
vincent
@pixel
It's a combination of the wowow and your determination to steer community out of low-effort replies. If it was wowow alone, wouldn't be a meme (think a "wowow" comment on a random HN thread, wouldn't go anywhere). It's the seriousness that makes it funny.
2 replies
0 recast
2 reactions

Alex Palmer pfp
Alex Palmer
@thatalexpalmer.eth
Wowow *checks notes* we should allow it (Why is that in shower thoughts what have I missed)
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

Nounish Prof ⌐◧-◧🎩 pfp
Nounish Prof ⌐◧-◧🎩
@nounishprof
wowow this is deep
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

Sahil 🥝 pfp
Sahil 🥝
@sahilk
Memes are but enjoyable spam. And so algorithms aren’t enough and need to be aided by active reporting. Wowow, I think I like my thoughts this morning.
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

Dubpace pfp
Dubpace
@dubpace
I think repetition is a shared quality of both spam and memes The difference is intent, which is difficult to algorithmically determine
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

Matthew Barton pfp
Matthew Barton
@mbar
Dan I think your unbridled gravitas is an untapped meme energy source
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction