Content
@
0 reply
0 recast
2 reactions
Dan Romero
@dwr.eth
Work in progress For the more technically inclined: how to think about the Farcaster protocol where it is today and what's left until we've reached a baseline level of credible neutrality. What's unclear to you?
11 replies
10 recasts
40 reactions
Gabriel Ayuso
@gabrielayuso.eth
Which L2? (When was the decision to go with L2 instead of L1 made?) Will the green identity points be supported on Warpcast by Nov 23 as well?
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
czar
@czar
Damn roadmaps on excalidraw. @v got dwr.
0 reply
1 recast
0 reaction
Connor McCormick ☀️
@nor
What are you going to use for onchain recovery? 👀
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
shazow
@shazow.eth
Where do channels live in this? Equivalent to a follow?
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Cameron Armstrong
@cameron
@moar FC roadmap
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
timdaub
@timdaub.eth
my understanding is that Discove pivoted, Jam open sourced + divested and that Warpcast now serves channels better than Alphacaster. I assume you still want to solve for multiple independent clients, but in my eyes the multi client vision failed for now. Can you explain where u see this going?
1 reply
0 recast
2 reactions
Landon
@lndnnft
Less credible neutrality and more protocol health, but are there any plans, protocol/FC team wise to deal with mass amounts of spam or otherwise hateful content esp as we get closer to permissionless/mainnet? Or is that more of a client-based thing
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Snax
@snax.eth
The text on the graphic because it’s too small 😅
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Drew Fisher
@drewf.eth
Will onchain signers support ERC 6492? Can a signer be verified based on code that doesn’t yet exist onchain, or must an event be emitted for initial signer setup to reduce RPC cu on hubs?
2 replies
0 recast
1 reaction
Nico.cast🐱
@n
Would it be possible for alt client like @farquest to offer a custom onboard flow, from wallet/signer creation to fid registration?
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Varun Kumar
@vkcs
Something no protocol has addressed(very relevant for social media) - "The right to be forgotten". Necessary if a protocol has to fit under gdpr norms last I checked. Its kinda dichotomy between immutability being a great feature (eg-significance to history) and "to be forgotten" As a democratic right. Relinquish?
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
