Content pfp
Content
@
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

Dan Romero pfp
Dan Romero
@dwr.eth
1st Amendment is good, actually.
18 replies
152 recasts
531 reactions

William Saar pfp
William Saar
@saarw.eth
It is! But ironically, section 230 of the DMCA has probably been more important for enabling communication platforms like this one vs other western countries that also have free speech protections similar to 1A
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

Dan Romero pfp
Dan Romero
@dwr.eth
No other country comes close to 1A unfortunately
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

William Saar pfp
William Saar
@saarw.eth
Main difference is you can't incite against groups, and even that sometimes gets overridden if speech has political/religious value. A pastor in Sweden got acquitted for saying gays were cancer because religious protections outweigh incitement laws Otherwise, it seems like a subtle difference in imminence (UK arson incitement would be illegal in the US too if they added "tomorrow")
2 replies
0 recast
0 reaction