Dan Romero pfp
Dan Romero
@dwr.eth
If having global state on a single server is important, you get to choose two: 1. Long term storage 2. Censorship resistant 3. Cheap
28 replies
15 recasts
339 reactions

ted (not lasso) pfp
ted (not lasso)
@ted
1 and 2. i'm willing to pay $$$$$ to sore my old ish.
1 reply
0 recast
6 reactions

Dwayne 'The Jock' Ronson pfp
Dwayne 'The Jock' Ronson
@dwayne
You start paying after you hit 10k casts?
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

Josbec🎩🔵 pfp
Josbec🎩🔵
@josbec
I think it’s important for a social network to have long storage though… In 2027 I want to be able to dig up my old casts and as well as others… Very few people knows that their casts are going into “thin air “ after some time
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

Trent pfp
Trent
@trent
allow users to turn on a setting "download all my data every 6 months"
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

Trish🫧 pfp
Trish🫧
@trish
A lot to think about. I understand the expense and I’m not putting that on FC. Maybe I’m wrong but your cast suggests to me that you are part of the 85-95 who don’t care as much? What do you think about biographers / historians not being able to access information in 50 years?
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

Brad Wilde pfp
Brad Wilde
@bwilde
1 and 2; pay to play.
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

jd 🌺 pfp
jd 🌺
@jdlewin.eth
does the architecture allow for 3rd parties to underwrite one's casts? could some babes spin up a coin to finance keeping your bangers alive in perpetuity
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

Jon "JonnyRingo" Williams⚰️ pfp
Jon "JonnyRingo" Williams⚰️
@jonnyringo.eth
I think Arweave could serve all 3 tho. "Cheap" might be subjective to the user however.
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

📿 zach harris 🙏🏼 pfp
📿 zach harris 🙏🏼
@zachharris.eth
@dwr.eth why global state on single server? Doesn't IPFS have BOTH distributed CDN and Cold Storage? Why not Option #4 – All of the above
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

adrienne pfp
adrienne
@adrienne
I'm convinced. 🫡 And I'm someone who very much used twitter as a long term database/catalog. But censorship resistant is too important to compromise. And when I decide to pay more for storage I just want it to be easy to do so, whether through warpcast, or an app like @farchiver or similar
0 reply
0 recast
3 reactions

vrypan |--o--| pfp
vrypan |--o--|
@vrypan.eth
I've been a strong advocate of long term storage and we had a number of debates on this, but I've flipped. The benefits of 2+3 are huge, and we can try addressing longterm storage outside the protocol.
0 reply
0 recast
2 reactions

Tayyab - d/acc pfp
Tayyab - d/acc
@tayyab
I’ll take 2-3. Lot of perma storage options in crypto the cost.
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

vern pfp
vern
@vern
What’s the long term scaling plan though? Even if you cap / charge for storage, there’s no way you’re gossiping reactions for 10mm users over a network of 300 nodes. At a certain point you sacrifice all 3
0 reply
0 recast
2 reactions

Nounish Prof ⌐◧-◧🎩 pfp
Nounish Prof ⌐◧-◧🎩
@nounishprof
Prefer to pay for storage than get a “free” app with ads. Even with twitter blue (yeah I’m not calling it that other thing) there are still ads & now a whole new upgrade to unlock stuff. Also @farchiver is a great option for keeping everything if you want.
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

William Mougayar pfp
William Mougayar
@wmougayar
1,2 & 3 rightly priced. I want everything, cake & cherries included. Continue à la carte tradition.
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

MJC pfp
MJC
@mjc716
is sharding on the pre-2030 roadmap
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

Sam (crazy candle person) ✦  pfp
Sam (crazy candle person) ✦
@samantha
2 and 3. People can build their own indexers to save their casts if they want. I don’t think what anyone is saying is THAT important right now and will change the world. Ready to be proven wrong 😊
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

Garrett  pfp
Garrett
@garrett
What are your thoughts on Filecoin?
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

JessieBroke pfp
JessieBroke
@jessiebroke
Codex was built to: 1. Store data long-term (you pay for it ofc) 2. Be censorship-resistant (encrypted dataset before protocol erasure codes the dataset and essentially stripes chunks across multiple different storage providers depending on how many 9's worth of data durability you choose) 3. Cheap (depends on market)
0 reply
1 recast
1 reaction