Vitalik Buterin
@vitalik.eth
Some personal user experiences: https://vitalik.ca/general/2023/02/28/ux.html
7 replies
0 recast
4 reactions
Dan Romero
@dwr.eth
3 responses 1. I also went to the sushi place that accepts bitcoin in 2013 and it worked. 2. Excited for ERC-4337 so Farcaster addresses can be smart contract wallets & have the ability to do off-chain signatures for Farcaster. 3. Do you see a world where all Ethereum transactions are privacy-preserving by default?
3 replies
0 recast
0 reaction
Dylan Mikus
@dbmikus
What are some of the use cases for off-chain signatures with Farcaster? I was reading about Farcaster account recovery yesterday, and recovery could happen with ERC-4337 paymasters, but I'm curious what else the Farcaster crew has been thinking about.
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Yousuf Haque
@yousufhaque.eth
Regarding point 3, a fully zk'ed evm is on the roadmap that vitalik signal boosts every year in December A fully zkEVM would be privacy preserving by default, similar to Aztec or mina
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
vincent
@pixel
Saw a 6529 tweet a while back: "Privacy is great, but look at the 6529 Museum account on Etherscan, the history of that address is unique and cool, and won't be seen if privacy on Eth is the default" (paraphrased).
4 replies
0 recast
0 reaction