Dan Romero pfp
Dan Romero
@dwr.eth
The new channel proposal enables channel legos - Channel owners have the freedom to mix and match tools and settings - Enables developers to build businesses at different parts of the channel stack, e.g. economic layer is now open season vs. current centralized channel pass model
27 replies
118 recasts
717 reactions
borodutch pfp
borodutch
@warpcastadmin.eth
i have a strong feeling that this unnecessarily overcomplicated the protocol and used-facing channel management on the other hand, i'm on board with giving devs more options still, something doesn't sit right with me here 🤔 sounds more like feels making features for geeks than for the people 🤔
5 replies
0 recast
4 reactions
GIGAMΞSH pfp
GIGAMΞSH
@gigamesh
Really excited to see how daos use it. Communication channels with good UX and infinitely customizable permissions seems like the structure they’ve been missing.
0 reply
0 recast
2 reactions
prego pfp
prego
@pedropregueiro
is this and other discussions around channels documented somewhere besides your casts @dwr.eth?
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
a1z2 pfp
a1z2
@a1z2
Sub-channels & governance tooling down the line at the protocol level? I’ve always thought channels had huge potential to be interest based daos
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
aaronv pfp
aaronv
@aaronv.eth
exciting stuff
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
BBB // M⬆️ pfp
BBB // M⬆️
@jianbing.eth
makes sense
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Domino pfp
Domino
@dominosmusic
Incredible
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Polymarket pfp
Polymarket
@polymarket
goated.
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
alec.eth is yapping🤠 pfp
alec.eth is yapping🤠
@alec.eth
Plugins like otoco.io for making onchain entities would be good to loop in on this too. Gotta protect the peeps Cc @chait
1 reply
1 recast
5 reactions
BPetes pfp
BPetes
@bpetes.eth
This is the cast I needed to see 🙏 Looking forward to playing w/ the UX surrounding smart-contract/DAO ownership.
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
Tempe.degen 🎩 pfp
Tempe.degen 🎩
@tempetechie.eth
How are moderators chosen? One option is autocracy where the channel creator remains channel mod forever. The other could be to tie the moderator role to an NFT. Anyone who holds that NFT would be the mod. This would unlock many different options on how to choose/elect a mod (e.g. via DAO onchain voting).
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
Dulng pfp
Dulng
@duongvu999
May the day ahead be filled with good vibes, positivity, and love. You deserve all the happiness in the world. Have an incredible day, my sweetheart.
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Juli 🎩↑ pfp
Juli 🎩↑
@juli
Seems like a big deal. Def have a diff channels with diff Econ & ownership in mind. Let‘s see how this gets adopted :)
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Open Source pfp
Open Source
@opensourceintel
@indexer what features are farcaster channel owners interested in seeing?
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
adnum pfp
adnum
@adnum
I realy like the idea of filter blocks in channels. Maybe recycle the action buttons idea and control the flow or blocks order to filter content
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
mdali.eth pfp
mdali.eth
@mdali.eth
That’s awesome! 👏 It would be great to see channels gated by @superfluid subscriptions
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Yusuff pfp
Yusuff
@hysolac
$FCKN cool
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
nonart.base.eth pfp
nonart.base.eth
@nonart.eth
looks great, good things are always happening at warpcast, we are excited with the improvements and developments 🏛️
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Amir pfp
Amir
@bitmorve
👌👌
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction