Dan Romero pfp
Dan Romero
@dwr.eth
The new channel proposal enables channel legos - Channel owners have the freedom to mix and match tools and settings - Enables developers to build businesses at different parts of the channel stack, e.g. economic layer is now open season vs. current centralized channel pass model
16 replies
104 recasts
668 reactions
borodutch @ lunchbreak.com pfp
borodutch @ lunchbreak.com
@farcasteradmin.eth
i have a strong feeling that this unnecessarily overcomplicated the protocol and used-facing channel management on the other hand, i'm on board with giving devs more options still, something doesn't sit right with me here ๐Ÿค” sounds more like feels making features for geeks than for the people ๐Ÿค”
4 replies
0 recast
10 reactions
GIGAMฮžSH pfp
GIGAMฮžSH
@gigamesh
Really excited to see how daos use it. Communication channels with good UX and infinitely customizable permissions seems like the structure theyโ€™ve been missing.
0 reply
0 recast
4 reactions
alec.eth @ ETHcc๐Ÿ”œ๐Ÿค  pfp
alec.eth @ ETHcc๐Ÿ”œ๐Ÿค 
@alec.eth
Plugins like otoco.io for making onchain entities would be good to loop in on this too. Gotta protect the peeps Cc @chait
1 reply
1 recast
6 reactions
a1z2 pfp
a1z2
@a1z2
Sub-channels & governance tooling down the line at the protocol level? Iโ€™ve always thought channels had huge potential to be interest based daos
0 reply
0 recast
2 reactions
prego pfp
prego
@pedropregueiro
is this and other discussions around channels documented somewhere besides your casts @dwr.eth?
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
BBB ๐Ÿ‘Š pfp
BBB ๐Ÿ‘Š
@jianbing.eth
makes sense
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Polymarket pfp
Polymarket
@polymarket
goated.
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
BPetes pfp
BPetes
@bpetes.eth
This is the cast I needed to see ๐Ÿ™ Looking forward to playing w/ the UX surrounding smart-contract/DAO ownership.
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
Tempe.degen ๐ŸŽฉ pfp
Tempe.degen ๐ŸŽฉ
@tempetechie.eth
How are moderators chosen? One option is autocracy where the channel creator remains channel mod forever. The other could be to tie the moderator role to an NFT. Anyone who holds that NFT would be the mod. This would unlock many different options on how to choose/elect a mod (e.g. via DAO onchain voting).
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
aaron.degen.eth ๐Ÿคก๐ŸŒ๐Ÿ”ฒ pfp
aaron.degen.eth ๐Ÿคก๐ŸŒ๐Ÿ”ฒ
@aaronv.eth
exciting stuff
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Ashish๐Ÿ“„ pfp
Ashish๐Ÿ“„
@iashish.eth
What I really love is the Farcaster will always be ahead of the game, if this happens, nothing can compete us ๐Ÿค˜
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Juli ๐ŸŽฉโ†‘ pfp
Juli ๐ŸŽฉโ†‘
@juli
Seems like a big deal. Def have a diff channels with diff Econ & ownership in mind. Letโ€˜s see how this gets adopted :)
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
adnum pfp
adnum
@adnum
I realy like the idea of filter blocks in channels. Maybe recycle the action buttons idea and control the flow or blocks order to filter content
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
mdali.eth pfp
mdali.eth
@mdali.eth
Thatโ€™s awesome! ๐Ÿ‘ It would be great to see channels gated by @superfluid subscriptions
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
katwolfie๐ŸŽฉ๐Ÿ”ฅ๐Ÿ’Ž๐Ÿ˜โœจ pfp
katwolfie๐ŸŽฉ๐Ÿ”ฅ๐Ÿ’Ž๐Ÿ˜โœจ
@katwolfie.eth
Nah. Wc is starting to look like this with similar algorithms. Can we not?
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Nima Leo ๐Ÿ’Ž๐ŸŽฉ pfp
Nima Leo ๐Ÿ’Ž๐ŸŽฉ
@nimaleophotos.eth
So cool, structures are getting more decentralized!
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Domino pfp
Domino
@dominosmusic
Incredible
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
silv pfp
silv
@silv.eth
2 $DEGEN
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction